On Tue, 2022-03-08 at 19:32 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> 
> I'd like to see the SAGV block time we got from the mailbox
> in the logs regardless of whether other factors prevent the
> use of SAGV.
> 
> So let's adjust the code to always query the SAGV block time,
> log it, and then reset it if SAGV is not actually supported.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>

Hi Ville,

I wonder if it is better to comprehend if we clean assigning  -1 to a u32 
variable first before
this? I see that you are doing that anyway in the next patch in this series. 
Was there any
particular reason?

BR
Vinod

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 8ee31c9590a7..21c37115c36e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3670,8 +3670,8 @@ intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>               dev_priv->sagv_status != I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED;
>  }
>  
> -static void
> -skl_setup_sagv_block_time(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +static u32
> +intel_sagv_block_time(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>       if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
>               u32 val = 0;
> @@ -3680,24 +3680,31 @@ skl_setup_sagv_block_time(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv)
>               ret = snb_pcode_read(dev_priv,
>                                    GEN12_PCODE_READ_SAGV_BLOCK_TIME_US,
>                                    &val, NULL);
> -             if (!ret) {
> -                     dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us = val;
> -                     return;
> +             if (ret) {
> +                     drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Couldn't read SAGV block 
> time!\n");
> +                     return -1;
>               }
>  
> -             drm_dbg(&dev_priv->drm, "Couldn't read SAGV block time!\n");
> +             return val;
>       } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 11) {
> -             dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us = 10;
> -             return;
> -     } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 9) {
> -             dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us = 30;
> -             return;
> +             return 10;
> +     } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 9 && !IS_LP(dev_priv)) {
> +             return 30;
>       } else {
> -             MISSING_CASE(DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv));
> +             /* Default to an unusable block time */
> +             return -1;
>       }
> +}
>  
> -     /* Default to an unusable block time */
> -     dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us = -1;
> +static void intel_sagv_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> +     i915->sagv_block_time_us = intel_sagv_block_time(i915);
> +
> +     drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "SAGV supported: %s, original SAGV block time: 
> %u us\n",
> +                 str_yes_no(intel_has_sagv(i915)), i915->sagv_block_time_us);
> +
> +     if (!intel_has_sagv(i915))
> +             i915->sagv_block_time_us = -1;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -8173,8 +8180,7 @@ void intel_init_pm(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>       else if (GRAPHICS_VER(dev_priv) == 5)
>               ilk_get_mem_freq(dev_priv);
>  
> -     if (intel_has_sagv(dev_priv))
> -             skl_setup_sagv_block_time(dev_priv);
> +     intel_sagv_init(dev_priv);
>  
>       /* For FIFO watermark updates */
>       if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9) {

Reply via email to