On Mon-02-05-2022 07:08 pm, Harry Wentland wrote:
On 2022-05-02 09:28, Modem, Bhanuprakash wrote:
On Fri-29-04-2022 08:02 pm, Murthy, Arun R wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
Bhanuprakash Modem
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 3:21 PM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org;
amd-
g...@lists.freedesktop.org; jani.nik...@linux.intel.com;
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com; harry.wentl...@amd.com; Sharma, Swati2
<swati2.sha...@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.sique...@amd.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [V2 3/3] drm/amd/display: Move connector debugfs to
drm
As drm_connector already have the display_info, instead of creating
"output_bpc" debugfs in vendor specific driver, move the logic to the
drm
layer.
This patch will also move "Current" bpc to the crtc debugfs from
connector
debugfs, since we are getting this info from crtc_state.
Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentl...@amd.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.sique...@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.mo...@intel.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
---
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.mur...@intel.com>
Thanks Arun,
@Harry/@Rodrigo, If this change sounds good to you, can you please help
to push it?
This changes the output_bpc debugfs behavior on amdgpu and breaks
the amd_max_bpc IGT test. I don't think we should merge this as-is.
Yeah, I have floated the IGT changes to support this series:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/102387/
With this IGT change, we can merge this series as-is. I would like to
request you to review IGT patches too.
This patch also seems dependent on patch 1 of the series. Shouldn't
they be merged together (please don't merge them as-is, though)?
Yes, as other patches in this series are already reviewed, I think we
need to plan to merge all patches in this series together (If above IGT
& this patch looks good to you).
- Bhanu
Harry
- Bhanu
Thanks and Regards,
Arun R Murthy
--------------------
