On 7/27/2022 6:44 PM, John Harrison wrote:
On 7/27/2022 17:33, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
The GuC FW applies the parent context policy to all the children,
so individual updates to the children are not supported and we
should not send them.

Note that sending the message did not have any functional consequences,
because the GuC just drops it and logs an error; since we were trying
to set the child policy to match the parent anyway the message being
dropped was not a problem.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospu...@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <john.c.harri...@intel.com>
Needs a Fixes tag for the original v70 update patch?

I don't think so. I added the explanation about it not being a functional issue to make it clear that everything still works as expected without this patch, just with a bit of extra noise in the GuC logs. If you think it is still worth applying to older kernels I'll add the tag in.

Daniele


John.

---
  .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 26 +------------------
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
index 76916aed897a..5e31e2540297 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
@@ -2420,7 +2420,6 @@ static int guc_context_policy_init_v70(struct intel_context *ce, bool loop)
      struct context_policy policy;
      u32 execution_quantum;
      u32 preemption_timeout;
-    bool missing = false;
      unsigned long flags;
      int ret;
  @@ -2438,32 +2437,9 @@ static int guc_context_policy_init_v70(struct intel_context *ce, bool loop)
          __guc_context_policy_add_preempt_to_idle(&policy, 1);
        ret = __guc_context_set_context_policies(guc, &policy, loop);
-    missing = ret != 0;
-
-    if (!missing && intel_context_is_parent(ce)) {
-        struct intel_context *child;
-
-        for_each_child(ce, child) {
-            __guc_context_policy_start_klv(&policy, child->guc_id.id);
-
-            if (engine->flags & I915_ENGINE_WANT_FORCED_PREEMPTION)
- __guc_context_policy_add_preempt_to_idle(&policy, 1);
-
-            child->guc_state.prio = ce->guc_state.prio;
-            __guc_context_policy_add_priority(&policy, ce->guc_state.prio); - __guc_context_policy_add_execution_quantum(&policy, execution_quantum); - __guc_context_policy_add_preemption_timeout(&policy, preemption_timeout);
-
-            ret = __guc_context_set_context_policies(guc, &policy, loop);
-            if (ret) {
-                missing = true;
-                break;
-            }
-        }
-    }
        spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
-    if (missing)
+    if (ret != 0)
          set_context_policy_required(ce);
      else
          clr_context_policy_required(ce);


Reply via email to