On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 10:56:03 -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
>
Hi Vinay,
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> >> index fc23c562d9b2..32e1f5dde5bb 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> >> @@ -1016,9 +1016,15 @@ void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq)
> >> if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) {
> >> slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
> >>
> >> + if (slpc->min_freq_softlimit == slpc->boost_freq)
> >> + return;
> > nit but is it possible that 'slpc->min_freq_softlimit > slpc->boost_freq'
> > (looks possible to me from the code though we might not have intended it)?
> > Then we can change this to:
> >
> > if (slpc->min_freq_softlimit >= slpc->boost_freq)
> > return;
Any comment about this? It looks clearly possible to me from the code.
So with the above change this is:
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.di...@intel.com>
