>From 8f392d11c51beb66e01a63af33d90cb0bf01eda4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: 
<8f392d11c51beb66e01a63af33d90cb0bf01eda4.1387201899.git.ian.lis...@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
From: ian-lister <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:46:51 +0000
Subject: [RFC 10/13] drm/i915: MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM fix

There are comments in i915_reg.h that suggest that an MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM
should be immediately preceded by a MI_NOOP. Added missing MI_NOOPs to
i915_gen7_sol_offsets.

Signed-off-by: ian-lister <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 885d595..c9d330a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -937,14 +937,20 @@ i915_reset_gen7_sol_offsets(struct drm_device *dev,
        if (!IS_GEN7(dev) || ring != &dev_priv->ring[RCS])
                return 0;
 
-       ret = intel_ring_begin(ring, 4 * 3);
+       ret = intel_ring_begin(ring, 2 + (4 * 4));
        if (ret)
                return ret;
 
+       /* Comments in i915_reg.h indicate that a MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM
+       * should be preceded by a MI_NOOP */
+       intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_NOOP);
+       intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_NOOP);
+
        for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
                intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1));
                intel_ring_emit(ring, GEN7_SO_WRITE_OFFSET(i));
                intel_ring_emit(ring, 0);
+               intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_NOOP);
        }
 
        intel_ring_advance(ring);
-- 
1.8.5.1


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to