On 1/31/23 9:48 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 09:46:18AM -0500, Anthony Krowiak wrote: > >>> Maybe you should split that lock and have a dedicated apcb lock? >> >> I don't think that would suffice for taking the vCPUs out of SIE. > > Then I think we have to keep this patch and also do Matthew's patch to > keep kvm refs inside vfio as well. >
I don't think keeping kvm refs inside vfio solves this issue though -- Even if we handle the kvm_put_kvm asynchronously within vfio as previously proposed, kvm_vfio_release will eventually get called and it gets called with the kvm->lock already held, then proceeds to call vfio_file_set_kvm which gets the group->lock. That order conflicts with the hierarchy used by the driver during open_device of vfio->group_lock ... kvm->lock.
