Hi Stanislav,

[...]

> +/**
> + * intel_display_to_pcode- inform pcode for display config
> + * @cdclk: current cdclk as per new or old state
> + * @voltage_level: current voltage_level send to Pcode
> + * @active_pipes: active pipes for more accurate power accounting
> + */
> +static void intel_display_to_pcode(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +                                unsigned int cdclk, u8 voltage_level,
> +                                u8 active_pipes)
> +{
> +     int ret;
> +

if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 12)
        return;

the rest can go outside the if and we save one indentation leve.

BTW... /dev_priv/i915/ ?

> +     if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> +             ret = skl_pcode_request(&dev_priv->uncore, 
> SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> +                                     SKL_CDCLK_PREPARE_FOR_CHANGE |
> +                                     DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_MASK
> +                                     (cdclk, active_pipes, voltage_level),
> +                                     SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE,
> +                                     SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE, 3);
> +             if (ret) {
> +                     drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
> +                                     "Failed to inform PCU about display 
> config (err %d)\n",
> +                                     ret);
> +                     return;
> +             }
> +     }
> +}

[...]

> +void intel_display_to_pcode_pre_notification(struct intel_atomic_state 
> *state)
> +{
> +     struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> +     const struct intel_cdclk_state *old_cdclk_state =
> +             intel_atomic_get_old_cdclk_state(state);
> +     const struct intel_cdclk_state *new_cdclk_state =
> +             intel_atomic_get_new_cdclk_state(state);
> +     if (!intel_cdclk_changed(&old_cdclk_state->actual,
> +                             &new_cdclk_state->actual) &&
> +                             (new_cdclk_state->active_pipes ==
> +                             old_cdclk_state->active_pipes))
> +             return;
> +     if (old_cdclk_state->actual.cdclk <= new_cdclk_state->actual.cdclk) {
> +             intel_display_to_pcode(dev_priv, new_cdclk_state->actual.cdclk,
> +                                     new_cdclk_state->actual.voltage_level,
> +                                     new_cdclk_state->active_pipes);
> +             return;
> +     }
> +     if (old_cdclk_state->actual.cdclk >= new_cdclk_state->actual.cdclk) {
> +             intel_display_to_pcode(dev_priv, old_cdclk_state->actual.cdclk,
> +                                     old_cdclk_state->actual.voltage_level,
> +                                     old_cdclk_state->active_pipes);
> +             return;
> +     }
> +     if (old_cdclk_state->active_pipes != new_cdclk_state->active_pipes) {
> +             intel_display_to_pcode(dev_priv, new_cdclk_state->actual.cdclk,
> +                                     new_cdclk_state->actual.voltage_level,
> +                                     new_cdclk_state->active_pipes);
> +             return;
> +     }
> +     intel_display_to_pcode(dev_priv, DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_CDCLK_MAX,
> +                             new_cdclk_state->actual.voltage_level,
> +                             new_cdclk_state->active_pipes);

if you replace all the ifs with "else if"s you can have only one
return and remove all the brackets.

> +}
> +
> +/*intel_display_to_pcode_post_notification: after frequency change sending
> + * voltage_level, active pipes, current CDCLK frequency.
> + * @state: intel atomic state
> + */
> +void intel_display_to_pcode_post_notification(struct intel_atomic_state 
> *state)
> +{
> +     struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> +     const struct intel_cdclk_state *new_cdclk_state =
> +             intel_atomic_get_new_cdclk_state(state);
> +             intel_display_to_pcode(dev_priv, new_cdclk_state->actual.cdclk,
> +                                     new_cdclk_state->actual.voltage_level,
> +                                     new_cdclk_state->active_pipes);

the indentation here is off

> +}

Andi

[...]

Reply via email to