On Dec-20-2013 7:35 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Jani Nikula
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Pradeep Bhat <[email protected]>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vandana Kannan <[email protected]>
>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
>>> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
>>> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
>>
>> I'm sorry, this is not true. Only I get to say when you can add my
>> Reviewed-by.
> 
> Yeah, you can't just add review-by comments. In the linux kernel this
> has a very specific meaning and can't just get handed out for "has
> looked at the patches". For details of what a reviewed-by tag means
> please see the "Reviewer's statement of oversight" in
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches. I've noticed that you've also done
> this with Ville's r-b tag for the picture ratio patch, I'll send out a
> note that this r-b isn't legit.
> -Daniel
> 
Thanks for your inputs.
I will remove the r-b tag from all DRRS related patches, keeping the
details of versions/review comments incorporated in the commit message.
Also, I will follow the same and resend the patch on picture aspect ratio.
- Vandana
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to