On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 02:51:34 -0800, Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> > +static int oa_init_gt(struct intel_gt *gt)
> > +{
> > + u32 num_groups = __num_perf_groups_per_gt(gt);
> > + struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> > + struct i915_perf_group *g;
> > + intel_engine_mask_t tmp;
> > +
> > + g = kcalloc(num_groups, sizeof(*g), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (drm_WARN_ON(>->i915->drm, !g))
> > + return -ENOMEM;
>
> No warnings or messages on -ENOMEM is standard policy.
Hmm I think this is the only error for which this code is failing the
probe. So if we are not going to fail the probe, we should at least allow a
WARN_ON? Exception proves the rule?