On Tue, 07 Mar 2023, "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovs...@intel.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 12:23:59PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Tue, 07 Mar 2023, "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovs...@intel.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 08:14:35PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 27 Feb 2023, Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovs...@intel.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Display to communicate display pipe count/CDCLK/voltage configuration
>> >> > to Pcode for more accurate power accounting for gen >= 12.
>> >> > Existing sequence is only sending the voltage value to the Pcode.
>> >> > Adding new sequence with current cdclk associate with voltage value
>> >> > masking.
>> >> > Adding pcode request when any pipe power well will disable or enable.
>> >> >
>> >> > v2: - Make intel_cdclk_need_serialize static to make CI compiler happy.
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovs...@intel.com>
>> >> > ---
>> >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 174 +++++++++++++++++++--
>> >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h | 2 +
>> >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 14 ++
>> >> > 3 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>> >> >
>> >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
>> >> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
>> >> > index 084a483f9776..df5a21f6a393 100644
>> >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
>> >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
>> >> > @@ -1932,10 +1932,10 @@ static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct
>> >> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> >> > * NOOP - No Pcode communication needed for
>> >> > * Display versions 14 and beyond
>> >> > */;
>> >> > - else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
>> >> > + else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 && !IS_DG2(dev_priv))
>> >> > ret = snb_pcode_write(&dev_priv->uncore,
>> >> > SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
>> >> > cdclk_config->voltage_level);
>> >> > - else
>> >> > + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 11) {
>> >> > /*
>> >> > * The timeout isn't specified, the 2ms used here is
>> >> > based on
>> >> > * experiment.
>> >> > @@ -1946,7 +1946,7 @@ static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private
>> >> > *dev_priv,
>> >> >
>> >> > HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
>> >> >
>> >> > cdclk_config->voltage_level,
>> >> > 150, 2);
>> >> > -
>> >> > + }
>> >> > if (ret) {
>> >> > drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
>> >> > "PCode CDCLK freq set failed, (err %d, freq
>> >> > %d)\n",
>> >> > @@ -2242,6 +2242,40 @@ void intel_cdclk_dump_config(struct
>> >> > drm_i915_private *i915,
>> >> > cdclk_config->voltage_level);
>> >> > }
>> >> >
>> >> > +static void intel_pcode_notify(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> >> > + u8 voltage_level,
>> >> > + u8 active_pipe_count,
>> >> > + u8 cdclk,
>>
>> How can that be u8?
>
> Agree, cdclk uses 10 bits according to BSpec, for the rest u8 is enough.
> Thanks for noticing.
>
>>
>> >> > + bool cdclk_update_valid,
>> >> > + bool pipe_count_update_valid)
>>
>> Also not super happy about the flags arguments... could have cdclk == 0
>> means not valid and int active_pipe_count == -1 means not valid. Maybe.
>
> Those are actually called that way, because BSpec calls those bits so.
> In fact it is more like "should we update this" flag.
> As I understand if it is not set PCode will simply ignore those bits in
> notification.
>
> The calling site should determine whether this bit need to be set or not.
> We set the to true only if correspodent state got changed.
> I think those are validated already, so we shouldn't expect any bogus values
> there(otherwise we are screwed in quite many other places), however cdclk == 0
> actually would be valid and this bit would be then set.
> Active pipe count is always amount of "1"'s in cdclk_state->active_pipes
> mask, so it shouldn't
> ever become -1. Or if it becomes, once again, this function would be the least
> of our problems.
>
>>
>> >> > +{
>> >> > + int ret;
>> >> > + u32 update_mask = 0;
>> >> > +
>> >> > + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 12)
>> >> > + return;
>> >> > +
>> >> > + update_mask = DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_UPDATE_MASK(cdclk,
>> >> > active_pipe_count, voltage_level);
>> >> > +
>> >> > + if (cdclk_update_valid)
>> >> > + update_mask |= DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_CDCLK_VALID;
>> >> > +
>> >> > + if (pipe_count_update_valid)
>> >> > + update_mask |= DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_PIPE_COUNT_VALID;
>> >> > +
>> >> > + ret = skl_pcode_request(&i915->uncore, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
>> >> > + SKL_CDCLK_PREPARE_FOR_CHANGE |
>> >> > + update_mask,
>> >> > + SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE,
>> >> > + SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE, 3);
>> >> > + if (ret) {
>> >> > + drm_err(&i915->drm,
>> >> > + "Failed to inform PCU about display
>> >> > config (err %d)\n",
>> >> > + ret);
>> >> > + return;
>> >>
>> >> Superfluous return.
>> >>
>> >> > + }
>> >> > +}
>> >> > +
>> >> > /**
>> >> > * intel_set_cdclk - Push the CDCLK configuration to the hardware
>> >> > * @dev_priv: i915 device
>> >> > @@ -2311,6 +2345,98 @@ static void intel_set_cdclk(struct
>> >> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> >> > }
>> >> > }
>> >> >
>> >> > +/**
>> >> > + * intel_cdclk_power_usage_to_pcode_pre_notification: display to pcode
>> >> > notification
>>
>> This doesn't need to be a kernel-doc comment (and it's a malformed one
>> at that). Ditto for the others.
>>
>> >> > + * before the enabling power wells.
>> >> > + * send notification with cdclk, number of pipes, voltage_level.
>> >> > + * @state: intel atomic state
>> >> > + */
>> >> > +void intel_cdclk_power_usage_to_pcode_pre_notification(struct
>> >> > intel_atomic_state *state)
>> >>
>> >> This could be static?
>> >>
>> >> Not happy with the name, really, but at least it could use a
>> >> verb. Notify instead of notification.
>> >
>> > Any hint for better naming?
>>
>> Maybe just intel_cdclk_pcode_pre_notify(),
>> intel_cdclk_pcode_post_notify(), and then intel_cdclk_pcode_notify() as
>> the shared thing?
>
> Sorry Jani, but I think we would be going in circles then, because initially
> you were stating that:
>
> "The function name should indicate what is being
> notified. Pre-notification of what? Post-notification of what?
>
> Functions in this file should be prefixed intel_cdclk_*."
>
> At this point it was called "intel_display_to_pcode_pre_notification", the
> prefix comment
> of course is now changed.
>
> So if I change it back to "pcode_pre_notify" thing, that would lose
> information
> about what its doing once again.
>
> I can for sure do that, but then what is the guarantee it won't get a comment
> about
> "lack of informativeness" once again? :)
*shrug* :)
Compared to the original, there's now "cdclk" in the name.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Stan
>
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> > +{
>> >> > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
>> >>
>> >> No new dev_priv please.
>> >>
>> >> > + const struct intel_cdclk_state *old_cdclk_state =
>> >> > + intel_atomic_get_old_cdclk_state(state);
>> >> > + const struct intel_cdclk_state *new_cdclk_state =
>> >> > + intel_atomic_get_new_cdclk_state(state);
>> >> > + unsigned int cdclk = 0; u8 voltage_level, num_active_pipes = 0;
>> >> > + bool change_cdclk, update_pipe_count;
>> >> > +
>> >> > + if (!intel_cdclk_changed(&old_cdclk_state->actual,
>> >> > + &new_cdclk_state->actual) &&
>> >> > + (new_cdclk_state->active_pipes ==
>> >> > + old_cdclk_state->active_pipes))
>> >> > + return;
>> >> > +
>> >> > + /* According to "Sequence Before Frequency Change", voltage
>> >> > level set to 0x3 */
>> >> > + voltage_level = DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_VOLTAGE_MAX;
>> >> > +
>> >> > + change_cdclk = new_cdclk_state->actual.cdclk !=
>> >> > old_cdclk_state->actual.cdclk;
>> >> > + update_pipe_count = hweight8(new_cdclk_state->active_pipes) >
>> >> > + hweight8(old_cdclk_state->active_pipes);
>> >> > +
>> >> > + /*
>> >> > + * According to "Sequence Before Frequency Change",
>> >> > + * if CDCLK is increasing, set bits 25:16 to upcoming CDCLK,
>> >> > + * if CDCLK is decreasing or not changing, set bits 25:16 to
>> >> > current CDCLK,
>> >> > + * which basically means we choose the maximum of old and new
>> >> > CDCLK, if we know both
>> >> > + */
>> >> > + if (change_cdclk)
>> >> > + cdclk = max(new_cdclk_state->actual.cdclk,
>> >> > old_cdclk_state->actual.cdclk);
>> >> > +
>> >> > + /*
>> >> > + * According to "Sequence For Pipe Count Change",
>> >> > + * if pipe count is increasing, set bits 25:16 to upcoming pipe
>> >> > count
>> >> > + * (power well is enabled)
>> >> > + * no action if it is decreasing, before the change
>> >> > + */
>> >> > + if (update_pipe_count)
>> >> > + num_active_pipes =
>> >> > hweight8(new_cdclk_state->active_pipes);
>> >> > +
>> >> > + intel_pcode_notify(dev_priv, voltage_level, num_active_pipes,
>> >> > cdclk,
>> >> > + change_cdclk, update_pipe_count);
>> >> > +}
>> >> > +
>> >> > +/* intel_cdclk_power_usage_to_pcode_post_notification: after frequency
>> >> > change sending
>> >> > + * voltage_level, active pipes, current CDCLK frequency.
>> >> > + * @state: intel atomic state
>> >> > + */
>> >> > +void intel_cdclk_power_usage_to_pcode_post_notification(struct
>> >> > intel_atomic_state *state)
>> >>
>> >> Ditto about static & naming.
>> >>
>> >> > +{
>> >> > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
>> >>
>> >> No new dev_priv please.
>> >>
>> >> > + const struct intel_cdclk_state *new_cdclk_state =
>> >> > + intel_atomic_get_new_cdclk_state(state);
>> >> > + const struct intel_cdclk_state *old_cdclk_state =
>> >> > + intel_atomic_get_old_cdclk_state(state);
>> >> > + unsigned int cdclk = 0; u8 voltage_level, num_active_pipes = 0;
>> >> > + bool update_cdclk, update_pipe_count;
>> >> > +
>> >> > + /* According to "Sequence After Frequency Change", set voltage
>> >> > to used level */
>> >> > + voltage_level = new_cdclk_state->actual.voltage_level;
>> >> > +
>> >> > + update_cdclk = new_cdclk_state->actual.cdclk !=
>> >> > old_cdclk_state->actual.cdclk;
>> >> > + update_pipe_count = hweight8(new_cdclk_state->active_pipes) <
>> >> > + hweight8(old_cdclk_state->active_pipes);
>> >> > +
>> >> > + /*
>> >> > + * According to "Sequence After Frequency Change",
>> >> > + * set bits 25:16 to current CDCLK
>> >> > + */
>> >> > + if (update_cdclk)
>> >> > + cdclk = new_cdclk_state->actual.cdclk;
>> >> > +
>> >> > + /*
>> >> > + * According to "Sequence For Pipe Count Change",
>> >> > + * if pipe count is decreasing, set bits 25:16 to current pipe
>> >> > count,
>> >> > + * after the change(power well is disabled)
>> >> > + * no action if it is increasing, after the change
>> >> > + */
>> >> > + if (update_pipe_count)
>> >> > + num_active_pipes =
>> >> > hweight8(new_cdclk_state->active_pipes);
>> >> > +
>> >> > + intel_pcode_notify(dev_priv, voltage_level, num_active_pipes,
>> >> > cdclk,
>> >> > + update_cdclk, update_pipe_count);
>> >> > +}
>> >> > +
>> >> > /**
>> >> > * intel_set_cdclk_pre_plane_update - Push the CDCLK state to the
>> >> > hardware
>> >> > * @state: intel atomic state
>> >> > @@ -2321,7 +2447,7 @@ static void intel_set_cdclk(struct
>> >> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> >> > void
>> >> > intel_set_cdclk_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>> >> > {
>> >> > - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
>> >> > + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(state->base.dev);
>> >> > const struct intel_cdclk_state *old_cdclk_state =
>> >> > intel_atomic_get_old_cdclk_state(state);
>> >> > const struct intel_cdclk_state *new_cdclk_state =
>> >> > @@ -2332,11 +2458,14 @@ intel_set_cdclk_pre_plane_update(struct
>> >> > intel_atomic_state *state)
>> >> > &new_cdclk_state->actual))
>> >> > return;
>> >> >
>> >> > + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 12)
>> >> > +
>> >> > intel_cdclk_power_usage_to_pcode_pre_notification(state);
>> >> > +
>> >> > if (pipe == INVALID_PIPE ||
>> >> > old_cdclk_state->actual.cdclk <=
>> >> > new_cdclk_state->actual.cdclk) {
>> >> > - drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm,
>> >> > !new_cdclk_state->base.changed);
>> >> > + drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, !new_cdclk_state->base.changed);
>> >> >
>> >> > - intel_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &new_cdclk_state->actual,
>> >> > pipe);
>> >> > + intel_set_cdclk(i915, &new_cdclk_state->actual, pipe);
>> >> > }
>> >> > }
>> >> >
>> >> > @@ -2350,7 +2479,7 @@ intel_set_cdclk_pre_plane_update(struct
>> >> > intel_atomic_state *state)
>> >> > void
>> >> > intel_set_cdclk_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>> >> > {
>> >> > - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
>> >> > + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(state->base.dev);
>> >> > const struct intel_cdclk_state *old_cdclk_state =
>> >> > intel_atomic_get_old_cdclk_state(state);
>> >> > const struct intel_cdclk_state *new_cdclk_state =
>> >> > @@ -2361,11 +2490,14 @@ intel_set_cdclk_post_plane_update(struct
>> >> > intel_atomic_state *state)
>> >> > &new_cdclk_state->actual))
>> >> > return;
>> >> >
>> >> > + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 12)
>> >> > +
>> >> > intel_cdclk_power_usage_to_pcode_post_notification(state);
>> >> > +
>> >> > if (pipe != INVALID_PIPE &&
>> >> > old_cdclk_state->actual.cdclk >
>> >> > new_cdclk_state->actual.cdclk) {
>> >> > - drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm,
>> >> > !new_cdclk_state->base.changed);
>> >> > + drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, !new_cdclk_state->base.changed);
>> >> >
>> >> > - intel_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &new_cdclk_state->actual,
>> >> > pipe);
>> >> > + intel_set_cdclk(i915, &new_cdclk_state->actual, pipe);
>> >> > }
>> >> > }
>> >> >
>> >> > @@ -2871,6 +3003,21 @@ int intel_cdclk_init(struct drm_i915_private
>> >> > *dev_priv)
>> >> > return 0;
>> >> > }
>> >> >
>> >> > +static bool intel_cdclk_need_serialize(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> >> > + const struct intel_cdclk_state
>> >> > *old_cdclk_state,
>> >> > + const struct intel_cdclk_state
>> >> > *new_cdclk_state)
>> >> > +{
>> >> > + /*
>> >> > + * We need to poke hw for gen >= 12, because we notify PCode if
>> >> > + * pipe power well count changes.
>> >> > + */
>> >> > + return intel_cdclk_changed(&old_cdclk_state->actual,
>> >> > + &new_cdclk_state->actual) ||
>> >> > + ((DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 12 &&
>> >> > + hweight8(old_cdclk_state->active_pipes) !=
>> >> > + hweight8(new_cdclk_state->active_pipes)));
>> >>
>> >> That's getting a bit unweildy for one expression.
>> >>
>> >> > +}
>> >> > +
>> >> > int intel_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>> >> > {
>> >> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
>> >> > @@ -2892,8 +3039,7 @@ int intel_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct
>> >> > intel_atomic_state *state)
>> >> > if (ret)
>> >> > return ret;
>> >> >
>> >> > - if (intel_cdclk_changed(&old_cdclk_state->actual,
>> >> > - &new_cdclk_state->actual)) {
>> >> > + if (intel_cdclk_need_serialize(dev_priv, old_cdclk_state,
>> >> > new_cdclk_state)) {
>> >> > /*
>> >> > * Also serialize commits across all crtcs
>> >> > * if the actual hw needs to be poked.
>> >> > @@ -2905,9 +3051,9 @@ int intel_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct
>> >> > intel_atomic_state *state)
>> >> > old_cdclk_state->force_min_cdclk !=
>> >> > new_cdclk_state->force_min_cdclk ||
>> >> > intel_cdclk_changed(&old_cdclk_state->logical,
>> >> > &new_cdclk_state->logical)) {
>> >> > - ret =
>> >> > intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_cdclk_state->base);
>> >> > - if (ret)
>> >> > - return ret;
>> >> > + ret =
>> >> > intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_cdclk_state->base);
>> >> > + if (ret)
>> >> > + return ret;
>>
>> Accidental indentation change?
>>
>> >> > } else {
>> >> > return 0;
>> >> > }
>> >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
>> >> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
>> >> > index 51e2f6a11ce4..fa356adc61d9 100644
>> >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
>> >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
>> >> > @@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ bool intel_cdclk_needs_modeset(const struct
>> >> > intel_cdclk_config *a,
>> >> > const struct intel_cdclk_config *b);
>> >> > void intel_set_cdclk_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state
>> >> > *state);
>> >> > void intel_set_cdclk_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state
>> >> > *state);
>> >> > +void intel_cdclk_power_usage_to_pcode_pre_notification(struct
>> >> > intel_atomic_state *state);
>> >> > +void intel_cdclk_power_usage_to_pcode_post_notification(struct
>> >> > intel_atomic_state *state);
>> >> > void intel_cdclk_dump_config(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> >> > const struct intel_cdclk_config
>> >> > *cdclk_config,
>> >> > const char *context);
>> >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> >> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> >> > index c1efa655fb68..9f786952585b 100644
>> >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> >> > @@ -6526,6 +6526,20 @@
>> >> > #define ICL_PCODE_MEM_SS_READ_GLOBAL_INFO (0x0 << 8)
>> >> > #define ICL_PCODE_MEM_SS_READ_QGV_POINT_INFO(point)
>> >> > (((point) << 16) | (0x1 << 8))
>> >> > #define ADL_PCODE_MEM_SS_READ_PSF_GV_INFO ((0) | (0x2 << 8))
>> >> > +#define DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_CDCLK_MAX 0x28D
>> >> > +#define DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_VOLTAGE_MASK REG_GENMASK(1,
>> >> > 0)
>> >> > +#define DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_VOLTAGE_MAX
>> >> > DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_VOLTAGE_MASK
>> >> > +#define DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_CDCLK_VALID REG_BIT(27)
>> >> > +#define DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_PIPE_COUNT_VALID REG_BIT(31)
>> >> > +#define DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_CDCLK_MASK REG_GENMASK(25, 16)
>> >> > +#define DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_PIPE_COUNT_MASK REG_GENMASK(30, 28)
>> >> > +#define DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_CDCLK(x)
>> >> > REG_FIELD_PREP(DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_CDCLK_MASK, (x))
>> >> > +#define DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_PIPE_COUNT(x)
>> >> > REG_FIELD_PREP(DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_PIPE_COUNT_MASK, (x))
>> >> > +#define DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_VOLTAGE(x)
>> >> > REG_FIELD_PREP(DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_VOLTAGE_MASK, (x))
>> >> > +#define DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_UPDATE_MASK(cdclk, num_pipes,
>> >> > voltage_level) \
>> >> > + (DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_CDCLK(cdclk)) | \
>> >> > + (DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_PIPE_COUNT(num_pipes)) | \
>> >> > + (DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_VOLTAGE(voltage_level))
>> >> > #define ICL_PCODE_SAGV_DE_MEM_SS_CONFIG 0xe
>> >> > #define ICL_PCODE_REP_QGV_MASK REG_GENMASK(1, 0)
>> >> > #define ICL_PCODE_REP_QGV_SAFE
>> >> > REG_FIELD_PREP(ICL_PCODE_REP_QGV_MASK, 0)
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
>>
>> --
>> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
