On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 11:01:41AM +0200, Jouni Högander wrote:
> PSR WM optimization should be disabled based on any wm level being
> disabled. Currently it's disabled always when using delayed vblank.
> 
> Bspec: 71580
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c           | 12 +++++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c       |  7 +++++--
>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> index c32bfba06ca1..60504c390408 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> @@ -1152,6 +1152,7 @@ struct intel_crtc_state {
>       bool has_psr2;
>       bool enable_psr2_sel_fetch;
>       bool req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline;
> +     bool wm_level_disabled;
>       u32 dc3co_exitline;
>       u16 su_y_granularity;
>       struct drm_dp_vsc_sdp psr_vsc;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index 44610b20cd29..a6edd65b8edb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -1177,13 +1177,11 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp 
> *intel_dp,
>        * Wa_16013835468
>        * Wa_14015648006
>        */
> -     if (IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0) ||
> -         IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 12, 13)) {
> -             if (crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_start !=
> -                 crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vdisplay)

That looks like something we want to keep. The delayed vblank w/a is
still supposedly necessary.

> -                     intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1, 0,
> -                                  wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp));
> -     }
> +     if ((IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0) ||
> +          IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 12, 13)) &&

I think we need this for all KBL+.

> +         crtc_state->wm_level_disabled)
> +             intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1, 0,
> +                          wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp));
>  
>       if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled) {
>               if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 9)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> index 50a9a6adbe32..afb751c024ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> @@ -2273,9 +2273,12 @@ static int skl_wm_check_vblank(struct intel_crtc_state 
> *crtc_state)
>               return level;
>  
>       /*
> -      * FIXME PSR needs to toggle LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_*
> +      * PSR needs to toggle LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_*
>        * based on whether we're limited by the vblank duration.
> -      *
> +      */
> +     crtc_state->wm_level_disabled = level < i915->display.wm.num_levels - 1;
> +
> +     /*
>        * FIXME also related to skl+ w/a 1136 (also unimplemented as of
>        * now) perhaps?
>        */

And that is more or less corresponding w/a for SKL/BXT that did not yet have
these chicken bits.

> -- 
> 2.34.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

Reply via email to