Hi, On 4/22/23 22:33, Patchwork wrote: > *Patch Details* > *Series:* drm/i915/dsi: Always use unconditional msleep() for the > panel_on_delay > *URL:* https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/116858/ > <https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/116858/> > *State:* failure > *Details:* > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_116858v1/index.html > <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_116858v1/index.html> > > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13043_full -> Patchwork_116858v1_full > > > Summary > > *FAILURE* > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_116858v1_full absolutely need > to be > verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_116858v1_full, please notify your bug team to allow > them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > > Participating hosts (7 -> 7) > > No changes in participating hosts > > > Possible new issues > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > Patchwork_116858v1_full: > > > IGT changes > > > Possible regressions > > * igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctx0: > o shard-snb: PASS > <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13043/shard-snb6/igt@gem_pp...@blt-vs-render-ctx0.html> > -> FAIL > <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_116858v1/shard-snb1/igt@gem_pp...@blt-vs-render-ctx0.html>
The only touched file is not used on snb, so this is a false positive. Regards, Hans
