On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 05:10:17PM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> If we are using Bigjoiner dpll_hw_state is supposed to be exactly
> same as for master crtc, so no need to save it's state for slave crtc.
Yeah, and the master has recalculated this already. I guess this
used to make some sense in the times when we did the dpll
calculations much later.
So probably deserves a
Fixes: 0ff0e219d9b8 ("drm/i915: Compute clocks earlier")
Anyways,
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 43d6ba980780..c3e93bdde29d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -4568,7 +4568,6 @@ copy_bigjoiner_crtc_state_modeset(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state,
> saved_state->uapi = slave_crtc_state->uapi;
> saved_state->scaler_state = slave_crtc_state->scaler_state;
> saved_state->shared_dpll = slave_crtc_state->shared_dpll;
> - saved_state->dpll_hw_state = slave_crtc_state->dpll_hw_state;
Seems like we should also remove it from the
intel_crtc_prepare_cleared_state() but that one clearly needs
much more thought due to the port_dpll[] stuff...
> saved_state->crc_enabled = slave_crtc_state->crc_enabled;
>
> intel_crtc_free_hw_state(slave_crtc_state);
> --
> 2.37.3
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
