Hi Rodrigo/Andi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 7:38 PM
> To: Andi Shyti <andi.sh...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Sripada, Radhakrishna <radhakrishna.srip...@intel.com>; intel-
> g...@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/mtl: Drop force_probe requirement
>
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 11:25:35AM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > Hi Radhakrishna,
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 12:36:24PM -0700, Radhakrishna Sripada wrote:
> > > Meteorlake has been very usable for a while now, all of uapi changes
> > > related to fundamental platform usage have been finalized and all
> > > required firmware blobs are available. Recent CI results have also
> > > been healthy, so we're ready to drop the force_probe requirement and
> > > enable the platform by default.
> > >
> > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.srip...@intel.com>
> >
> > Please keep me in the loop as well... It's been a year I've been
> > working for this patch to work :)
Sure will do.
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 1 -
> > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> > > index df7c261410f7..fe748906c06f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> > > @@ -836,7 +836,6 @@ static const struct intel_device_info mtl_info = {
> > > .has_pxp = 1,
> > > .memory_regions = REGION_SMEM | REGION_STOLEN_LMEM,
> > > .platform_engine_mask = BIT(RCS0) | BIT(BCS0) | BIT(CCS0),
> > > - .require_force_probe = 1,
> >
> > What's the thinking behind this patch? Are you trying to
> > understand how CI behaves?
>
> CI uses kernel config to force_probe. MTL is already being tested there.
> Also there's no 'CI' or 'HAX' tag on this patch.
> So I would assume this is the ask to remove the protection.
> But based on this question from Andi and knowing that he is working on
> the MTL w/a I'm assuming that this is not the right time yet to remove
> this protection.
>
> Please ensure all the diligence is taken before sending this patch again.
>
> Also ensure that the current CI failures are fixed (gt_pm and gt_engines)
> and that CI has a stable green picture.
Sure Rodrigo. I believe the changes in
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/123329/
are significant enough to not remove force_probe at this time.
Will wait for a later time till CI comes clean.
Thanks,
Radhakrishna
>
> Thanks,
> Rodrigo.
>
> >
> > Andi
> >
> > > MTL_CACHELEVEL,
> > > };
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
