On Fri, 29 Sep 2023, Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]> wrote: > The goal is to have this function ready for Xe to use > directly. So, let's use the available macro.
Seesm wrong to use DISPLAY_INFO() as an lvalue, and I'm not sure why this wouldn't work as-is. But *shrug*. Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> for merging to i915. (xe should come as a backport with cherry-pick -x.) BR, Jani > > Cc: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c > index a6a18eae7ae8..ce55b968e658 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c > @@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ void intel_display_device_probe(struct drm_i915_private > *i915) > else > info = probe_display(i915); > > - i915->display.info.__device_info = info; > + DISPLAY_INFO(i915) = info; > > memcpy(DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(i915), > &DISPLAY_INFO(i915)->__runtime_defaults, -- Jani Nikula, Intel
