On Mon, 09 Oct 2023, Suraj Kandpal <[email protected]> wrote: > Free hw_crtc_state in verify_crtc_state after we are done using > this or else it's just a resource leak.
Fixes: ? > > Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c > index 303eb68fec11..5e1c2c780412 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c > @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state, > } > > if (!sw_crtc_state->hw.active) > - return; > + goto destroy_state; > > intel_pipe_config_sanity_check(hw_crtc_state); > > @@ -224,6 +224,9 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state, > intel_crtc_state_dump(hw_crtc_state, NULL, "hw state"); > intel_crtc_state_dump(sw_crtc_state, NULL, "sw state"); > } > + > +destroy_state: > + intel_crtc_destroy_state(&crtc->base, &hw_crtc_state->uapi); > } > > void intel_modeset_verify_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state, -- Jani Nikula, Intel
