On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 11:37:37AM +0200, Mika Kahola wrote:
> At least one TGL had regression when using u8 types
> for entry setup frames calculation. So, let's switch
> to use ints instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kah...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index 3691f882e1c0..a4417e85f92a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -1093,12 +1093,12 @@ static bool _compute_psr2_wake_times(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
> return true;
> }
>
> -static u8 intel_psr_entry_setup_frames(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> - const struct drm_display_mode
> *adjusted_mode)
> +static int intel_psr_entry_setup_frames(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> + const struct drm_display_mode
> *adjusted_mode)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> int psr_setup_time = drm_dp_psr_setup_time(intel_dp->psr_dpcd);
> - u8 entry_setup_frames = 0;
> + int entry_setup_frames = 0;
You didn't change the other one in _psr_compute_config()
so this still looks broken to me.
>
> if (psr_setup_time < 0) {
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> --
> 2.34.1
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
