On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 03:18:39PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > Callers of intel_dp_max_data_rate() use the return value as an upper > bound for the BW a given mode requires. As such the rounding shouldn't > result in a bigger value than the actual upper bound. Use round-down > instead of -closest accordingly. > > Cc: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <[email protected]>
LGTM, Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > index 120d435d27ff1..209c27167e057 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ intel_dp_max_data_rate(int max_link_rate, int max_lanes) > */ > int max_link_rate_kbps = max_link_rate * 10; > > - max_link_rate_kbps = > DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(mul_u32_u32(max_link_rate_kbps, 9671), 10000); > + max_link_rate_kbps = > DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL(mul_u32_u32(max_link_rate_kbps, 9671), 10000); > max_link_rate = max_link_rate_kbps / 8; > } > > @@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ intel_dp_max_data_rate(int max_link_rate, int max_lanes) > * out to be a nop by coincidence, and can be skipped: > * > * int max_link_rate_kbps = max_link_rate * 10; > - * max_link_rate_kbps = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(max_link_rate_kbps * > 8, 10); > + * max_link_rate_kbps = DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL(max_link_rate_kbps * 8, > 10); > * max_link_rate = max_link_rate_kbps / 8; > */ > > -- > 2.39.2 >
