On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 06:21:07PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 05:09:27PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > The current way of calculating the pbn_div value, the link BW per each
> > MTP slot, worked only for DP 1.4 link rates. Fix things up for UHBR
> > rates calculating with the correct channel coding efficiency based on
> > the link rate.
> > 
> > v2:
> > - Return the fractional pbn_div value from drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw().
> > v3:
> > - Fix rounding up quotient while calculating req_slots. (Ville)
> > 
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Lyude Paul <ly...@redhat.com>
> > Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>

Dave, Sima, it looks like this whole series is ready for getting merged:

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/126526/

But it has these 3 drm/dp_mst here.
Ack to merge them through drm-intel?

> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 10 +++++++---
> >  include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h           | 13 +++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > index 000d05e80352a..8ca01a6bf645d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > @@ -3585,14 +3585,18 @@ static int drm_dp_send_up_ack_reply(struct 
> > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> >  fixed20_12 drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw(const struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr 
> > *mgr,
> >                                 int link_rate, int link_lane_count)
> >  {
> > +   int ch_coding_efficiency =
> > +           
> > drm_dp_bw_channel_coding_efficiency(drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate(link_rate));
> >     fixed20_12 ret;
> >  
> >     if (link_rate == 0 || link_lane_count == 0)
> >             drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev, "invalid link rate/lane count: (%d / 
> > %d)\n",
> >                         link_rate, link_lane_count);
> >  
> > -   /* See DP v2.0 2.6.4.2, 
> > VCPayload_Bandwidth_for_OneTimeSlotPer_MTP_Allocation */
> > -   ret.full = dfixed_const(link_rate * link_lane_count / 54000);
> > +   /* See DP v2.0 2.6.4.2, 2.7.6.3 
> > VCPayload_Bandwidth_for_OneTimeSlotPer_MTP_Allocation */
> > +   ret.full = DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL(mul_u32_u32(link_rate * link_lane_count,
> > +                                             ch_coding_efficiency),
> > +                                 (1000000ULL * 8 * 5400) >> 12);
> >  
> >     return ret;
> >  }
> > @@ -4342,7 +4346,7 @@ int drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots(struct 
> > drm_atomic_state *state,
> >             }
> >     }
> >  
> > -   req_slots = DIV_ROUND_UP(pbn, dfixed_trunc(topology_state->pbn_div));
> > +   req_slots = DIV_ROUND_UP(dfixed_const(pbn), 
> > topology_state->pbn_div.full);
> >  
> >     drm_dbg_atomic(mgr->dev, "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] [MST PORT:%p] TU %d -> 
> > %d\n",
> >                    port->connector->base.id, port->connector->name,
> > diff --git a/include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h 
> > b/include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h
> > index c5f1079acb3b1..863b2e7add29e 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h
> > @@ -252,6 +252,19 @@ drm_edp_backlight_supported(const u8 
> > edp_dpcd[EDP_DISPLAY_CTL_CAP_SIZE])
> >     return !!(edp_dpcd[1] & DP_EDP_TCON_BACKLIGHT_ADJUSTMENT_CAP);
> >  }
> >  
> > +/**
> > + * drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate - Determine if a link rate is UHBR
> > + * @link_rate: link rate in 10kbits/s units
> > + *
> > + * Determine if the provided link rate is an UHBR rate.
> > + *
> > + * Returns: %True if @link_rate is an UHBR rate.
> > + */
> > +static inline bool drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate(int link_rate)
> > +{
> > +   return link_rate >= 1000000;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * DisplayPort AUX channel
> >   */
> > -- 
> > 2.39.2
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel

Reply via email to