On Wed, 22 Nov 2023, "Saarinen, Jani" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Musial, Ewelina <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 4:25 PM >> To: Saarinen, Jani <[email protected]>; Jani Nikula >> <[email protected]>; Illipilli, TejasreeX >> <[email protected]>; >> LGCI Bug Filing <[email protected]>; Andy Shevchenko >> <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt >> to get rid >> of IOSF GPIO (rev2) >> >> But this list had only series which were in queue here https://intel-gfx- >> ci.01.org/queue/index.html and today I was checking exactly how queue for >> shards is created and there are jobs which are not displayed there. Directly >> in >> Jenkins we do have multiple more jobs than in this queue only and I also >> killed >> them. I was discussing exactly this case today with Michał and he pointed >> out that >> in explanation below queues we do have highlighted: >> Due to technical limitation this is just an approximation of the queue. It >> is good >> for assessing the length of the queue, but should not be considered as >> completely accurate. > OK. So could have been in the list but not sure.
Okay, timeout. I just pushed the series. I trust Hans' testing here, considering the likely platform impact of the series and CI coverage of said platforms. Thanks for the patches and review. BR, Jani. >> >> Regards, >> Ewelina >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Saarinen, Jani <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 3:04 PM >> To: Musial, Ewelina <[email protected]>; Jani Nikula >> <[email protected]>; Illipilli, TejasreeX >> <[email protected]>; >> LGCI Bug Filing <[email protected]>; Andy Shevchenko >> <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt >> to get rid >> of IOSF GPIO (rev2) >> >> HI, >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Intel-gfx <[email protected]> On Behalf Of >> > Musial, Ewelina >> > Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 3:39 PM >> > To: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>; Illipilli, TejasreeX >> > <[email protected]>; LGCI Bug Filing >> > <[email protected]>; Andy Shevchenko >> > <[email protected]> >> > Cc: [email protected] >> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dsi: 4th >> > attempt to get rid of IOSF GPIO (rev2) >> > >> > Hi, I reviewed what I could, and my conclusion is that CI.FULL for >> > this series was killed due to my work around 126526v6 - yesterday I >> > was asked to do whatever I can to speed up shards testing for >> > mentioned series and I killed multiple sessions which were higher in >> > queue. We do not have option to simply bump priority for premerge >> > series and the only way (not recommended but sometimes needed) is to >> > drop everything what is higher. I've added this series back to queue. >> > Sorry for inconvenience >> Nope. It was not part of that list. We checked that with Jani too. See those >> pictures we discussed. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Ewelina >> >> Br, >> Jani S -- Jani Nikula, Intel
