On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 08:24:52AM +0000, Sean Young wrote:
> In order to introduce a pwm api which can be used from atomic context,
> we will need two functions for applying pwm changes:
> 
>       int pwm_apply_might_sleep(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *);
>       int pwm_apply_atomic(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *);
> 
> This commit just deals with renaming pwm_apply_state(), a following
> commit will introduce the pwm_apply_atomic() function.
> 
> Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> # for input
> Acked-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Young <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to