On Tue, 23 Jan 2024, Ville Syrjala <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
>
> Make the log easier to parse by including the name of the PLL
> in the debug prints regarding said PLL.

On the series,

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>

>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 39 ++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index 7a6f777eb80f..ce97677d44f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -4475,25 +4475,25 @@ verify_single_dpll_state(struct drm_i915_private 
> *i915,
>       u8 pipe_mask;
>       bool active;
>  
> -     drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "%s\n", pll->info->name);
> -
>       active = intel_dpll_get_hw_state(i915, pll, &dpll_hw_state);
>  
>       if (!(pll->info->flags & INTEL_DPLL_ALWAYS_ON)) {
>               I915_STATE_WARN(i915, !pll->on && pll->active_mask,
> -                             "pll in active use but not on in sw 
> tracking\n");
> +                             "%s: pll in active use but not on in sw 
> tracking\n",
> +                             pll->info->name);
>               I915_STATE_WARN(i915, pll->on && !pll->active_mask,
> -                             "pll is on but not used by any active pipe\n");
> +                             "%s: pll is on but not used by any active 
> pipe\n",
> +                             pll->info->name);
>               I915_STATE_WARN(i915, pll->on != active,
> -                             "pll on state mismatch (expected %i, found 
> %i)\n",
> -                             pll->on, active);
> +                             "%s: pll on state mismatch (expected %i, found 
> %i)\n",
> +                             pll->info->name, pll->on, active);
>       }
>  
>       if (!crtc) {
>               I915_STATE_WARN(i915,
>                               pll->active_mask & ~pll->state.pipe_mask,
> -                             "more active pll users than references: 0x%x vs 
> 0x%x\n",
> -                             pll->active_mask, pll->state.pipe_mask);
> +                             "%s: more active pll users than references: 
> 0x%x vs 0x%x\n",
> +                             pll->info->name, pll->active_mask, 
> pll->state.pipe_mask);
>  
>               return;
>       }
> @@ -4502,21 +4502,22 @@ verify_single_dpll_state(struct drm_i915_private 
> *i915,
>  
>       if (new_crtc_state->hw.active)
>               I915_STATE_WARN(i915, !(pll->active_mask & pipe_mask),
> -                             "pll active mismatch (expected pipe %c in 
> active mask 0x%x)\n",
> -                             pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask);
> +                             "%s: pll active mismatch (expected pipe %c in 
> active mask 0x%x)\n",
> +                             pll->info->name, pipe_name(crtc->pipe), 
> pll->active_mask);
>       else
>               I915_STATE_WARN(i915, pll->active_mask & pipe_mask,
> -                             "pll active mismatch (didn't expect pipe %c in 
> active mask 0x%x)\n",
> -                             pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask);
> +                             "%s: pll active mismatch (didn't expect pipe %c 
> in active mask 0x%x)\n",
> +                             pll->info->name, pipe_name(crtc->pipe), 
> pll->active_mask);
>  
>       I915_STATE_WARN(i915, !(pll->state.pipe_mask & pipe_mask),
> -                     "pll enabled crtcs mismatch (expected 0x%x in 0x%x)\n",
> -                     pipe_mask, pll->state.pipe_mask);
> +                     "%s: pll enabled crtcs mismatch (expected 0x%x in 
> 0x%x)\n",
> +                     pll->info->name, pipe_mask, pll->state.pipe_mask);
>  
>       I915_STATE_WARN(i915,
>                       pll->on && memcmp(&pll->state.hw_state, &dpll_hw_state,
>                                         sizeof(dpll_hw_state)),
> -                     "pll hw state mismatch\n");
> +                     "%s: pll hw state mismatch\n",
> +                     pll->info->name);
>  }
>  
>  void intel_shared_dpll_state_verify(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> @@ -4538,11 +4539,11 @@ void intel_shared_dpll_state_verify(struct 
> intel_atomic_state *state,
>               struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = old_crtc_state->shared_dpll;
>  
>               I915_STATE_WARN(i915, pll->active_mask & pipe_mask,
> -                             "pll active mismatch (didn't expect pipe %c in 
> active mask (0x%x))\n",
> -                             pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask);
> +                             "%s: pll active mismatch (didn't expect pipe %c 
> in active mask (0x%x))\n",
> +                             pll->info->name, pipe_name(crtc->pipe), 
> pll->active_mask);
>               I915_STATE_WARN(i915, pll->state.pipe_mask & pipe_mask,
> -                             "pll enabled crtcs mismatch (found pipe %c in 
> enabled mask (0x%x))\n",
> -                             pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->state.pipe_mask);
> +                             "%s: pll enabled crtcs mismatch (found pipe %c 
> in enabled mask (0x%x))\n",
> +                             pll->info->name, pipe_name(crtc->pipe), 
> pll->state.pipe_mask);
>       }
>  }

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

Reply via email to