On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 04:11:54PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 05.03.24 um 17:25 schrieb Jani Nikula:
> > On Tue, 05 Mar 2024, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 02:42:55PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> > > > Unregister all in-kernel clients before unloading the i915 driver. For
> > > > other drivers, drm_dev_unregister() does this automatically. As i915
> > > > does not use this helper, it has to perform the call by itself. For xe,
> > > > do the same in xe_device_remove()
> > > >
> > > > Note that there are currently no in-kernel clients in i915 or xe. The
> > > > patch prepares the drivers for a related update of their fbdev support.
> > > >
> > > > v7:
> > > > * update xe driver
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmerm...@suse.de>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c | 3 +++
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 3 +++
> > > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> > > > index 9ee902d5b72c4..97910a85e3917 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> > > > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
> > > > #include <drm/drm_aperture.h>
> > > > #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
> > > > +#include <drm/drm_client.h>
> > > > #include <drm/drm_ioctl.h>
> > > > #include <drm/drm_managed.h>
> > > > #include <drm/drm_probe_helper.h>
> > > > @@ -852,6 +853,8 @@ void i915_driver_remove(struct drm_i915_private
> > > > *i915)
> > > > {
> > > > intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> > > > + drm_client_dev_unregister(&i915->drm);
> > > > +
> > > > wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&i915->runtime_pm);
> > > > i915_driver_unregister(i915);
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> > > > index 919ad88f0495a..7f41f0ec819f0 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> > > probably deserves a separate patch since this is one here is named
> > > 'drm/i915:'
> > Or do this for both in intel_display_driver_unregister()?
>
> Ok, sure. I'll update this. I also have to update i915 and xe in patches 5
> and 6. I don't see how I can change them individually. How would I best log
> against both of them? drm/{i915,xe}? or drm/intel?
hmmm... though one...
drm-intel is the name of the i915 repository
well, perhaps drm/{i915,xe} works
or maybe just drm/i915/display: because since display is shared, that
kind of "tag" would be an indication that xe needs it as well anyway.
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
> >
> > BR,
> > Jani.
> >
> >
> > > > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> > > > #include <drm/drm_aperture.h>
> > > > #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
> > > > +#include <drm/drm_client.h>
> > > > #include <drm/drm_gem_ttm_helper.h>
> > > > #include <drm/drm_ioctl.h>
> > > > #include <drm/drm_managed.h>
> > > > @@ -614,6 +615,8 @@ void xe_device_remove(struct xe_device *xe)
> > > > struct xe_gt *gt;
> > > > u8 id;
> > > > + drm_client_dev_unregister(&xe->drm);
> > > > +
> > > > xe_device_remove_display(xe);
> > > > xe_display_fini(xe);
> > > > --
> > > > 2.43.2
> > > >
>
> --
> --
> Thomas Zimmermann
> Graphics Driver Developer
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
> Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany
> GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman
> HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
>
