> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Ville
> Syrjala
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2024 11:16 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915: Optimize out redundant dbuf slice updates
> 
> From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> 
> if the new dbuf slices are a superset of the old dbuf slices then we don't 
> have to
> do anything in intel_dbuf_post_plane_update(). Restructure the code to skip 
> such
> redundant dbuf slice updates. The main benefit is slightly less confusing 
> logs.

Looks Good to me.
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <[email protected]>

> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 27 +++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> index 1b48009efe2b..50ec51065118 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> @@ -3788,16 +3788,20 @@ void intel_dbuf_pre_plane_update(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state)
>               intel_atomic_get_new_dbuf_state(state);
>       const struct intel_dbuf_state *old_dbuf_state =
>               intel_atomic_get_old_dbuf_state(state);
> +     u8 old_slices, new_slices;
> 
> -     if (!new_dbuf_state ||
> -         new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices == old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices)
> +     if (!new_dbuf_state)
> +             return;
> +
> +     old_slices = old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices;
> +     new_slices = old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices |
> +new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices;
> +
> +     if (old_slices == new_slices)
>               return;
> 
>       WARN_ON(!new_dbuf_state->base.changed);
> 
> -     gen9_dbuf_slices_update(i915,
> -                             old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices |
> -                             new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices);
> +     gen9_dbuf_slices_update(i915, new_slices);
>  }
> 
>  void intel_dbuf_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state) @@ -
> 3807,15 +3811,20 @@ void intel_dbuf_post_plane_update(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state)
>               intel_atomic_get_new_dbuf_state(state);
>       const struct intel_dbuf_state *old_dbuf_state =
>               intel_atomic_get_old_dbuf_state(state);
> +     u8 old_slices, new_slices;
> 
> -     if (!new_dbuf_state ||
> -         new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices == old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices)
> +     if (!new_dbuf_state)
> +             return;
> +
> +     old_slices = old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices | new_dbuf_state-
> >enabled_slices;
> +     new_slices = new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices;
> +
> +     if (old_slices == new_slices)
>               return;
> 
>       WARN_ON(!new_dbuf_state->base.changed);
> 
> -     gen9_dbuf_slices_update(i915,
> -                             new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices);
> +     gen9_dbuf_slices_update(i915, new_slices);
>  }
> 
>  static int skl_watermark_ipc_status_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> --
> 2.43.2

Reply via email to