Hi Rodrigo,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 05:31:07PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> This null check is bogus because we are already using 'ce' stuff
> in many places before this function is called.
>
> Having this here is useless and confuses static analyzer tools
> that can see:
>
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine = ce->engine;
>
> before this check, in the same function.
>
> Fixes: cec82816d0d0 ("drm/i915/guc: Use context hints for GT frequency")
there is no need to have the Fixes tag here.
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/
> Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar <[email protected]>
> Cc: John Harrison <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> index 01d0ec1b30f2..24a82616f844 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> @@ -2677,7 +2677,7 @@ static int guc_context_policy_init_v70(struct
> intel_context *ce, bool loop)
> execution_quantum = engine->props.timeslice_duration_ms * 1000;
> preemption_timeout = engine->props.preempt_timeout_ms * 1000;
>
> - if (ce && (ce->flags & BIT(CONTEXT_LOW_LATENCY)))
> + if (ce->flags & BIT(CONTEXT_LOW_LATENCY))
We could keep the check but make it earlier.
Thanks,
Andi
> slpc_ctx_freq_req |= SLPC_CTX_FREQ_REQ_IS_COMPUTE;
>
> __guc_context_policy_start_klv(&policy, ce->guc_id.id);
> --
> 2.44.0
