Quoting Ville Syrjala (2024-03-27 14:45:40-03:00)
>From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>
>Add some debugs so that we can actually observe what is
>actually happening during the mbus/dbuf programming steps.
>We can just shove them into fairly low level functions as
>none of them are called during any critical sections/etc.
>
>Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.so...@intel.com>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
>b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
>index 7767c5eada36..a118ecf9e532 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
>@@ -3647,6 +3647,9 @@ void intel_dbuf_mdclk_cdclk_ratio_update(struct
>drm_i915_private *i915, u8 ratio
> if (joined_mbus)
> ratio *= 2;
>
>+ drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Updating dbuf ratio to %d (mbus joined:
>%s)\n",
>+ ratio, str_yes_no(joined_mbus));
>+
> for_each_dbuf_slice(i915, slice)
> intel_de_rmw(i915, DBUF_CTL_S(slice),
> DBUF_MIN_TRACKER_STATE_SERVICE_MASK,
>@@ -3680,10 +3683,16 @@ static void intel_dbuf_mdclk_min_tracker_update(struct
>intel_atomic_state *state
> static void intel_dbuf_mbus_join_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(state->base.dev);
>+ const struct intel_dbuf_state *old_dbuf_state =
>+ intel_atomic_get_old_dbuf_state(state);
> const struct intel_dbuf_state *new_dbuf_state =
> intel_atomic_get_new_dbuf_state(state);
> u32 mbus_ctl;
>
>+ drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Changing mbus joined: %s -> %s\n",
>+ str_yes_no(old_dbuf_state->joined_mbus),
>+ str_yes_no(new_dbuf_state->joined_mbus));
>+
> /*
> * TODO: Implement vblank synchronized MBUS joining changes.
> * Must be properly coordinated with dbuf reprogramming.
>--
>2.43.2
>
