On Wed, 22 May 2024, Mika Kahola <[email protected]> wrote:
> Currently, we may bump into pll mismatch errors during the
> state verification stage. This happens when we try to use
> fastset instead of full modeset. Hence, we would need to add
> a check for pipe configuration to ensure that the sw and the
> hw configuration will match. In case of hw and sw mismatch,
> we would need to disable fastset and use full modeset instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.h | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 39 ++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 116 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> index c9e5bb6ecfd7..f549753ab1cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> @@ -2038,6 +2038,7 @@ static int intel_c10pll_calc_state(struct
> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> if (crtc_state->port_clock == tables[i]->clock) {
> crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.cx0pll.c10 = *tables[i];
> intel_c10pll_update_pll(crtc_state, encoder);
> + crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.cx0pll.use_c10 = true;
The readout doesn't set use_c10 anywhere, does it?
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -2277,6 +2278,7 @@ static int intel_c20pll_calc_state(struct
> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> for (i = 0; tables[i]; i++) {
> if (crtc_state->port_clock == tables[i]->clock) {
> crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.cx0pll.c20 = *tables[i];
> + crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.cx0pll.use_c10 = false;
> return 0;
> }
> }
> @@ -3272,6 +3274,78 @@ void intel_cx0pll_readout_hw_state(struct
> intel_encoder *encoder,
> intel_c20pll_readout_hw_state(encoder, &pll_state->c20);
> }
>
> +static bool mtl_compare_hw_state_c10(const struct intel_c10pll_state *a,
> + const struct intel_c10pll_state *b)
> +{
> + return a->clock == b->clock ||
> + a->tx == b->tx ||
> + a->cmn == b->cmn ||
> + a->pll[0] == b->pll[0] ||
> + a->pll[1] == b->pll[1] ||
> + a->pll[2] == b->pll[2] ||
> + a->pll[3] == b->pll[3] ||
> + a->pll[4] == b->pll[4] ||
> + a->pll[5] == b->pll[5] ||
> + a->pll[6] == b->pll[6] ||
> + a->pll[7] == b->pll[7] ||
> + a->pll[8] == b->pll[8] ||
> + a->pll[9] == b->pll[9] ||
> + a->pll[10] == b->pll[10] ||
> + a->pll[11] == b->pll[11] ||
> + a->pll[12] == b->pll[12] ||
> + a->pll[13] == b->pll[13] ||
> + a->pll[14] == b->pll[14] ||
> + a->pll[15] == b->pll[15] ||
> + a->pll[16] == b->pll[16] ||
> + a->pll[17] == b->pll[17] ||
> + a->pll[18] == b->pll[18] ||
> + a->pll[19] == b->pll[19];
How about memcmp(a->pll, b->pll, sizeof(a->pll)) == 0 instead?
> +}
> +
> +static bool mtl_compare_hw_state_c20(const struct intel_c20pll_state *a,
> + const struct intel_c20pll_state *b)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + if (a->clock != b->clock)
> + return false;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> + if (a->tx[i] != b->tx[i])
> + return false;
> + }
memcmp with sizeof, so we don't have to hardcode the sizes.
> +
> + for (i = 4; i < 4; i++) {
Typo, this does nothing... but memcmp.
> + if (a->cmn[i] != b->cmn[i])
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if (a->tx[0] & C20_PHY_USE_MPLLB) {
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(a->mpllb); i++) {
> + if (a->mpllb[i] != b->mpllb[i])
> + return false;
> + }
> + } else {
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(a->mplla); i++) {
> + if (a->mplla[i] != b->mplla[i])
> + return false;
> + }
> + }
And memcmp.
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +bool intel_cx0pll_compare_hw_state(const struct intel_cx0pll_state *a,
> + const struct intel_cx0pll_state *b)
> +{
Maybe this for starters?
if (a->use_c10 != b->use_c10)
return false;
> + if (a->use_c10 && b->use_c10)
> + return mtl_compare_hw_state_c10(&a->c10,
> + &b->c10);
> + else
> + return mtl_compare_hw_state_c20(&a->c20,
> + &b->c20);
> +}
> +
> int intel_cx0pll_calc_port_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> const struct intel_cx0pll_state *pll_state)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.h
> index 3e03af3e006c..180821df1834 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ void intel_c10pll_dump_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv,
> const struct intel_c10pll_state *hw_state);
> void intel_cx0pll_state_verify(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> +bool intel_cx0pll_compare_hw_state(const struct intel_cx0pll_state *a,
> + const struct intel_cx0pll_state *b);
> void intel_c20pll_dump_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> const struct intel_c20pll_state *hw_state);
> void intel_cx0_phy_set_signal_levels(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index cce1420fb541..17b43b2ae0e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@
> #include "intel_crtc.h"
> #include "intel_crtc_state_dump.h"
> #include "intel_cursor_regs.h"
> +#include "intel_cx0_phy.h"
> #include "intel_ddi.h"
> #include "intel_de.h"
> #include "intel_display_driver.h"
> @@ -5002,6 +5003,30 @@ pipe_config_pll_mismatch(struct drm_printer *p, bool
> fastset,
> intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(i915, p, b);
> }
>
> +static void
> +pipe_config_cx0pll_mismatch(struct drm_printer *p, bool fastset,
> + const struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> + const char *name,
> + const struct intel_cx0pll_state *a,
> + const struct intel_cx0pll_state *b)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> +
> + pipe_config_mismatch(p, fastset, crtc, name, " "); /* stupid
> -Werror=format-zero-length */
Instead of working around something and adding comments like that, maybe
actually use it for something useful?
Something like, idk, "%s", a->c10 ? "c10" : "c20"
> +
> + if (a->use_c10) {
> + drm_printf(p, "expected:\n");
> + intel_c10pll_dump_hw_state(i915, &a->c10);
> + drm_printf(p, "found:\n");
> + intel_c10pll_dump_hw_state(i915, &b->c10);
> + } else {
> + drm_printf(p, "expected:\n");
> + intel_c20pll_dump_hw_state(i915, &a->c20);
> + drm_printf(p, "found:\n");
> + intel_c20pll_dump_hw_state(i915, &b->c20);
> + }
> + drm_printf(p, "found:\n");
> + intel_c10pll_dump_hw_state(i915, &b->c10);
> + } else {
> + drm_printf(p, "expected:\n");
> + intel_c20pll_dump_hw_state(i915, &a->c20);
> + drm_printf(p, "found:\n");
> + intel_c20pll_dump_hw_state(i915, &b->c20);
> + }
I think I'd add a intel_cx0pll_dump_hw_state() to avoid looking into the
details like this at high level code. This becomes cleaner too.
> +}
> +
> bool
> intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
> const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> @@ -5105,6 +5130,16 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct
> intel_crtc_state *current_config,
> } \
> } while (0)
>
> +#define PIPE_CONF_CHECK_PLL_CX0(name) do { \
> + if (!intel_cx0pll_compare_hw_state(¤t_config->name, \
> + &pipe_config->name)) { \
> + pipe_config_cx0pll_mismatch(&p, fastset, crtc,
> __stringify(name), \
> + ¤t_config->name, \
> + &pipe_config->name); \
> + ret = false; \
> + } \
> +} while (0)
> +
> #define PIPE_CONF_CHECK_TIMINGS(name) do { \
> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(name.crtc_hdisplay); \
> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(name.crtc_htotal); \
> @@ -5337,6 +5372,10 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct
> intel_crtc_state *current_config,
> if (dev_priv->display.dpll.mgr || HAS_GMCH(dev_priv))
> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_PLL(dpll_hw_state);
>
> + /* FIXME convert MTL+ platforms over to dpll_mgr */
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 14)
> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_PLL_CX0(dpll_hw_state.cx0pll);
> +
> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dsi_pll.ctrl);
> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dsi_pll.div);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> index f09e513ce05b..36baed75b89a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> @@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ struct intel_cx0pll_state {
> struct intel_c20pll_state c20;
> };
> bool ssc_enabled;
> + bool use_c10;
> };
>
> struct intel_dpll_hw_state {
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
