From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>

Rename intel_fbc_hw_tracking_covers_screen() to intel_fbc_surface_size_ok()
so that the naming scheme is the same for the surface size vs. plane
size checks. "surface size" is what bspec talks about.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
index c7fd774440a8..40a3b4937dc5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
@@ -1102,7 +1102,7 @@ static void intel_fbc_max_surface_size(struct 
intel_display *display,
  * the X and Y offset registers. That's why we include the src x/y offsets
  * instead of just looking at the plane size.
  */
-static bool intel_fbc_hw_tracking_covers_screen(const struct intel_plane_state 
*plane_state)
+static bool intel_fbc_surface_size_ok(const struct intel_plane_state 
*plane_state)
 {
        struct intel_display *display = 
to_intel_display(plane_state->uapi.plane->dev);
        unsigned int effective_w, effective_h, max_w, max_h;
@@ -1354,7 +1354,7 @@ static int intel_fbc_check_plane(struct 
intel_atomic_state *state,
                return 0;
        }
 
-       if (!intel_fbc_hw_tracking_covers_screen(plane_state)) {
+       if (!intel_fbc_surface_size_ok(plane_state)) {
                plane_state->no_fbc_reason = "surface size too big";
                return 0;
        }
-- 
2.44.2

Reply via email to