On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 08:13:41PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> From: Stanislav Lisovskiy <[email protected]>
> 
> Implement required changes for mode validation and compute config,
> to support Ultrajoiner.
> 
> v2:
> -Drop changes for HDMI.
> -Separate out DSC changes into another patch.
> v3: Fix check in can_ultrajoiner. (Ankit)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 369829ea5a12..4005700ab043 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -871,24 +871,34 @@ u32 get_max_compressed_bpp_with_joiner(struct 
> drm_i915_private *i915,
>                                      int num_joined_pipes)
>  {
>       u32 max_bpp_small_joiner_ram;
> +     u32 max_bpp_joiner;
>  
>       /* Small Joiner Check: output bpp <= joiner RAM (bits) / Horiz. width */
>       max_bpp_small_joiner_ram = small_joiner_ram_size_bits(i915) / 
> mode_hdisplay;
> +     max_bpp_joiner = max_bpp_small_joiner_ram;
>  
> -     if (num_joined_pipes == 2) {
> -             int bigjoiner_interface_bits = DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14 ? 36 : 
> 24;
> +     /* if ultra joiner is enabled, we have 2 bigjoiners enabled */
> +     if (num_joined_pipes == 2 ||
> +         num_joined_pipes == 4) {

I guess just 'num_joined_pipes > 1' or something could be
used for all cases like this.

> +             int joiner_interface_bits = DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14 ? 36 : 24;

Isn't this specifically about bigjoiner? If so the name should stay as
is.

>               /* With bigjoiner multiple dsc engines are used in parallel so 
> PPC is 2 */
>               int ppc = 2;
> -             u32 max_bpp_bigjoiner =
> -                     i915->display.cdclk.max_cdclk_freq * ppc * 
> bigjoiner_interface_bits /
> +             max_bpp_joiner =
> +                     i915->display.cdclk.max_cdclk_freq * ppc * 
> joiner_interface_bits /
>                       intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock);
>  
>               max_bpp_small_joiner_ram *= 2;

Can't we just multiply both max_* with num_joined_pipes
to take care of both bigjoiner and ultrajoiner?

>  
> -             return min(max_bpp_small_joiner_ram, max_bpp_bigjoiner);
>       }
> +     if (num_joined_pipes == 4) {
> +             /* TODO: Check for ultrajoiner ram constraints */
>  
> -     return max_bpp_small_joiner_ram;
> +             /* both get multiplied by 2, because ram bits/ppc now doubled */
> +             max_bpp_small_joiner_ram *= 2;
> +             max_bpp_joiner *= 2;
> +     }
> +
> +     return min(max_bpp_small_joiner_ram, max_bpp_joiner);
>  }
>  
>  u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_max_compressed_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> @@ -994,6 +1004,10 @@ u8 intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(const struct 
> intel_connector *connector,
>               if (num_joined_pipes == 2 && test_slice_count < 4)
>                       continue;
>  
> +             /* ultrajoiner needs 2 bigjoiners to be enabled */
> +             if (num_joined_pipes == 4 && test_slice_count < 8)
> +                     continue;
> +
>               if (min_slice_count <= test_slice_count)
>                       return test_slice_count;
>       }
> @@ -1270,6 +1284,18 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid_downstream(struct intel_connector 
> *connector,
>       return MODE_OK;
>  }
>  
> +static
> +bool intel_dp_needs_ultrajoiner(struct intel_dp *dp, int clock)
> +{
> +     const struct intel_encoder *encoder = &dp_to_dig_port(dp)->base;
> +     struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);

struct intel_display *display = intel_display(intel_dp);

> +
> +     if (!HAS_ULTRAJOINER(i915))
> +             return false;
> +
> +     return clock > (i915->display.cdclk.max_dotclk_freq * 2);

Redundant parens.

> +}
> +
>  static
>  bool intel_dp_needs_bigjoiner(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>                             struct intel_connector *connector,
> @@ -1296,6 +1322,8 @@ int intel_dp_compute_num_pipes(struct intel_dp 
> *intel_dp,
>               MISSING_CASE(connector->force_joined_pipes);
>               fallthrough;
>       case 0:
> +             if (intel_dp_needs_ultrajoiner(intel_dp, clock))

Hmm. Technically we should be checking the same things for both
bigjoiner and ultrajoiner.

How about something like this with parametrized number 
of pipes:

bool intel_dp_needs_joiner(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
                           struct intel_connector *connector,
                           int hdisplay, int clock,
                           int num_joined_pipes)
{
        if (!intel_dp_has_joiner(intel_dp))
                return false;

        num_joined_pipes /= 2;

        return clock > num_joined_pipes * max_dotclk_freq ||
                hdisplay > num_joined_pipes * 5120;
}

Pair that with HAS_*JOINER(), and pass in the correct number
of joined pipes to get final answer.


> +                     return 4;
>               if (intel_dp_needs_bigjoiner(intel_dp, connector, hdisplay, 
> clock))
>                       return 2;
>       }
> @@ -2542,8 +2570,10 @@ bool intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc(struct drm_i915_private 
> *i915,
>        * Pipe joiner needs compression up to display 12 due to bandwidth
>        * limitation. DG2 onwards pipe joiner can be enabled without
>        * compression.
> +      * Ultrajoiner always needs compression.
>        */
> -     return !HAS_UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER(i915) && num_joined_pipes == 2;
> +     return (!HAS_UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER(i915) && num_joined_pipes == 2) ||
> +             num_joined_pipes == 4;
>  }
>  
>  static int
> -- 
> 2.45.2

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

Reply via email to