> -----Original Message-----
> From: Borah, Chaitanya Kumar <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2024 12:02 PM
> To: Srikanth V, NagaVenkata <[email protected]>; intel-
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Add FEC Enable Retry mechanism
>
> Hello Srikanth,
>
> Thank you for the review.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Srikanth V, NagaVenkata <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2024 4:16 PM
> > To: Borah, Chaitanya Kumar <[email protected]>; intel-
> > [email protected]; [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Add FEC Enable Retry mechanism
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Intel-xe <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
> > > Chaitanya Kumar Borah
> > > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2024 10:22 AM
> > > To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > > Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Add FEC Enable Retry mechanism
> > >
> > > From PTL, FEC_DECODE_EN sequence can be sent to a DPRX independent
> > > of TRANS_CONF enable. This allows us to re-issue an FEC_DECODE_EN
> > > sequence without re-doing the whole mode set sequence. This separate
> > > control over FEC_ECODE_EN/DIS sequence enables us to have a retry
> > > mechanism in case the DPRX does not respond with an FEC_ENABLE
> > > within
> > the stipulated 5ms.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah
> > > <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 61
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > > index 85e519a21542..589acea9906a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > > @@ -78,6 +78,8 @@
> > > #include "skl_scaler.h"
> > > #include "skl_universal_plane.h"
> > >
> > > +#define FEC_RETRY_COUNT 3
> > > +
> > > static const u8 index_to_dp_signal_levels[] = {
> > > [0] = DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_0 |
> > DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_0,
> > > [1] = DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_0 |
> > DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_1, @@
> > > -2255,6 +2257,57 @@ static int read_fec_detected_status(struct
> > > drm_dp_aux *aux)
> > > return status;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void retry_fec_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > > + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > > + struct drm_dp_aux *aux)
> > > +{
> > > + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(aux->drm_dev);
> > > + int ret = 0;
> > > +
> >
> > You should also be clearing FEC_ENABLE_LIVE_STATUS in DP_TP_STATUS
> > register by writing 1.
> >
>
> This seems to be a RO bit according to spec.
>
You are right. But we could wait till FEC_ENABLE_LIVE_STATUS is cleared after
clearing
FEC_ENABLE in DP_TP_CTL. We could also use FEC_DISABLE_PENDING in DP_TP_CTL
also here.
> > > + /* Clear FEC enable */
> > > + intel_de_rmw(i915, dp_tp_ctl_reg(encoder, crtc_state),
> > > + DP_TP_CTL_FEC_ENABLE, 0);
> > > +
> >
> > > + /* Set FEC enable */
> > > + intel_de_rmw(i915, dp_tp_ctl_reg(encoder, crtc_state),
> > > + 0, DP_TP_CTL_FEC_ENABLE);
> > > +
> > > + ret = intel_de_wait_for_set(i915, dp_tp_status_reg(encoder,
> > > crtc_state),
> > > + DP_TP_STATUS_FEC_ENABLE_LIVE, 1);
> > > + if (!ret)
> > > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> > > + "Timeout waiting for FEC live state to get
> enabled");
> > }
> > > +
> > > +static void wait_for_fec_detected_with_retry(struct intel_encoder
> > *encoder,
> > > + const struct intel_crtc_state
> > > *crtc_state,
> > > + struct drm_dp_aux *aux)
> > > +{
> > > + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(aux->drm_dev);
> > > + int status;
> > > + int err;
> > > + int retrycount = 0;
> > > +
> > > + do {
> > > + err = readx_poll_timeout(read_fec_detected_status, aux,
> > > status,
> > > + status &
> > > DP_FEC_DECODE_EN_DETECTED || status < 0,
> > > + 500, 5000);
> > > +
> > > + if (!err && status >= 0)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + if (err == -ETIMEDOUT) {
> > > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> > > + "Timeout waiting for FEC ENABLE to get
> > > detected, retrying\n");
> > > + retry_fec_enable(encoder, crtc_state, aux);
> > > + } else {
> > > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "FEC detected status
> > read
> > > error: %d\n", status);
> > > + }
> > > + } while (retrycount++ < FEC_RETRY_COUNT);
> > > +
> > > + drm_err(&i915->drm, "FEC enable Failed after Retry\n"); }
> > > +
> > > static void wait_for_fec_detected(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, bool
> enabled) {
> > > struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(aux->drm_dev); @@ -
> > 2303,8
> > > +2356,12 @@ void intel_ddi_wait_for_fec_status(struct intel_encoder
> > > *encoder,
> > > * At least the Synoptics MST hub doesn't set the detected flag for
> > > * FEC decoding disabling so skip waiting for that.
> > > */
> > > - if (enabled)
> > > - wait_for_fec_detected(&intel_dp->aux, enabled);
> > > + if (enabled) {
> > > + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 30)
> > > + wait_for_fec_detected_with_retry(encoder,
> > crtc_state,
> > > &intel_dp->aux);
> >
> > wait_for_fec_detected_with_retry() should be called inside
> > intel_ddi_enable_fec() after configuring DP_TP_CTL register and before
> > transcoder is enabled.
> > wait_for_fec_detected() is called after transcoder is enabled.
> >
>
> Agreed. I will make the change.
>
> Regards
>
> Chaitanya
>
> > > + else
> > > + wait_for_fec_detected(&intel_dp->aux, enabled);
> > > + }
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void intel_ddi_enable_fec(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
