On Wed, 09 Oct 2024, Jouni Högander <[email protected]> wrote:
> We are about to change meaning of vblank_enabled to fix Panel Replay vblank
> workaround. For sake of clarity we need to rename it. Vblank_enabled is
> used for i915gm/i945gm vblank irq workaround as well -> instead of rename
> add new counter named as vblank_wa_pipes.
>
> v2:
>   - s/vblank_wa_pipes/vblank_wa_num_pipes/
>   - use int as a type for the counter
>
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h | 2 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c  | 8 ++++----
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
> index 982dd9469195..45697af25fa9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
> @@ -455,6 +455,8 @@ struct intel_display {
>               /* For i915gm/i945gm vblank irq workaround */
>               u8 vblank_enabled;

Maybe we want to rename this one too?

BR,
Jani.

>  
> +             int vblank_wa_num_pipes;
> +
>               struct work_struct vblank_dc_work;
>  
>               u32 de_irq_mask[I915_MAX_PIPES];
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c
> index a4367ddc7a44..8226ea218d77 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c
> @@ -1424,7 +1424,7 @@ static void intel_display_vblank_dc_work(struct 
> work_struct *work)
>       struct intel_display *display =
>               container_of(work, typeof(*display), irq.vblank_dc_work);
>       struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(display->drm);
> -     u8 vblank_enabled = READ_ONCE(display->irq.vblank_enabled);
> +     int vblank_wa_num_pipes = READ_ONCE(display->irq.vblank_wa_num_pipes);
>  
>       /*
>        * NOTE: intel_display_power_set_target_dc_state is used only by PSR
> @@ -1432,7 +1432,7 @@ static void intel_display_vblank_dc_work(struct 
> work_struct *work)
>        * PSR code. If DC3CO is taken into use we need take that into account
>        * here as well.
>        */
> -     intel_display_power_set_target_dc_state(i915, vblank_enabled ? 
> DC_STATE_DISABLE :
> +     intel_display_power_set_target_dc_state(i915, vblank_wa_num_pipes ? 
> DC_STATE_DISABLE :
>                                               DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC6);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ int bdw_enable_vblank(struct drm_crtc *_crtc)
>       if (gen11_dsi_configure_te(crtc, true))
>               return 0;
>  
> -     if (display->irq.vblank_enabled++ == 0 && crtc->block_dc_for_vblank)
> +     if (display->irq.vblank_wa_num_pipes++ == 0 && 
> crtc->block_dc_for_vblank)
>               schedule_work(&display->irq.vblank_dc_work);
>  
>       spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
> @@ -1478,7 +1478,7 @@ void bdw_disable_vblank(struct drm_crtc *_crtc)
>       bdw_disable_pipe_irq(dev_priv, pipe, GEN8_PIPE_VBLANK);
>       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
>  
> -     if (--display->irq.vblank_enabled == 0 && crtc->block_dc_for_vblank)
> +     if (--display->irq.vblank_wa_num_pipes == 0 && 
> crtc->block_dc_for_vblank)
>               schedule_work(&display->irq.vblank_dc_work);
>  }

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

Reply via email to