On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:52:47 +0100 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Ville Syrjälä > <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > >> Heh, I went the other way round, dropped the runtime pm put from the > >> timer and flushed the forcewaker timer when we suspended the device... > > > > That's what I meant. No delayed runtime_pm_put. > > Well I've figured we want to keep this ... have things changed > sufficiently meanwhile? I've lost a bit track in all that recent > shuffling ... Can we pull the forcewake bits out of the reg functions and just do a check and WARN instead? -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
