On 09-01-2025 16:45, Nilawar, Badal wrote:
On 09-01-2025 15:50, Nilawar, Badal wrote:
On 09-01-2025 15:00, [email protected] wrote:
From: Sk Anirban<[email protected]>
Fix the frequency calculation by ensuring it is adjusted
only once during power measurement. Update live_rps_power test
to use the correct frequency values for logging and comparison.
v2:
- Improved frequency logging (Riana)
Signed-off-by: Sk Anirban<[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Riana Tauro<[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c
index c207a4fb03bf..e515d7eb628a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c
@@ -1126,6 +1126,7 @@ static u64 measure_power_at(struct intel_rps *rps, int
*freq)
{
*freq = rps_set_check(rps, *freq);
msleep(100);
+ *freq = intel_gpu_freq(rps, *freq);
I am seeingrps_set_check will wait till act freq become desired freq, in case of
timeout act freq could be different. I think it would be good to
check freq returned by rps_set_check is expected freq if not then
read freq again after msleep.
Please ignore above comments, I got your code. You are applying freq
multiplier before passing to measure_power. While this approach works
fine, I recommend fixing measure_power() by using read_cagf() instead
of intel_rps_read_actual_frequency().
Add Fixes: ac4e8560248f ("drm/i915/selftests: Add helper function
measure_power") in commit message.
Regards,
Badal
The measure_power() function is being used by slpc also, as slpc is not
passing the raw frequency it may cause issue. So the plan is to create
independent function to measure power for slpc, and for rps I will be
using read_cagf() to calculate the avg.
Regards,
Anirban
Regards, Badal
return measure_power(rps, freq);
}
@@ -1202,13 +1203,13 @@ int live_rps_power(void *arg)
pr_info("%s: min:%llumW @ %uMHz, max:%llumW @ %uMHz\n",
engine->name,
- min.power, intel_gpu_freq(rps, min.freq),
- max.power, intel_gpu_freq(rps, max.freq));
+ min.power, min.freq,
+ max.power, max.freq);
if (10 * min.freq >= 9 * max.freq) {
- pr_notice("Could not control frequency, ran at [%d:%uMHz,
%d:%uMhz]\n",
- min.freq, intel_gpu_freq(rps, min.freq),
- max.freq, intel_gpu_freq(rps, max.freq));
+ pr_notice("Could not control frequency, ran at [%uMHz,
%uMhz]\n",
+ min.freq,
+ max.freq);
continue;
}