From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Looks like there are some redundant lines in the main loop of
i915_gem_object_get_pages_gtt.
v2: Put CONFIG_SWIOTLB back in.
I haven't tested this so just RFC please. Not sure that
seven lines net less is worth this. It just made it clerer
to a newby to sg building to think of it in terms of
"merge entries always except when...".
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 15 ++++-----------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 00c8361..b435db1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -1912,15 +1912,11 @@ i915_gem_object_get_pages_gtt(struct
drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NO_KSWAPD;
gfp &= ~(__GFP_IO | __GFP_WAIT);
}
+ if (!i || page_to_pfn(page) != last_pfn + 1
#ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
- if (swiotlb_nr_tbl()) {
- st->nents++;
- sg_set_page(sg, page, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
- sg = sg_next(sg);
- continue;
- }
+ || swiotlb_nr_tbl()
#endif
- if (!i || page_to_pfn(page) != last_pfn + 1) {
+ ) {
if (i)
sg = sg_next(sg);
st->nents++;
@@ -1933,10 +1929,7 @@ i915_gem_object_get_pages_gtt(struct drm_i915_gem_object
*obj)
/* Check that the i965g/gm workaround works. */
WARN_ON((gfp & __GFP_DMA32) && (last_pfn >= 0x00100000UL));
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
- if (!swiotlb_nr_tbl())
-#endif
- sg_mark_end(sg);
+ sg_mark_end(sg);
obj->pages = st;
if (i915_gem_object_needs_bit17_swizzle(obj))
--
1.9.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
