Hello Alexander, On 26/03/2025 at 17:26:12 +02, Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usys...@intel.com> wrote:
> Create master device without partition when > CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER flag is unset. > > This streamlines device tree and allows to anchor > runtime power management on master device in all cases. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usys...@intel.com> I successfully tested it, this patch will be applied at -rc1 to the mtd/next tree. I was wondering, do you think it would be possible to keep the creation of mtd_master and make it a symbolic link to mtdx when MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER=y or when there is no partition? In short, always having mtd_masterx, because I fear at some point we'll have problems otherwise :-) Right now we have: - Without partition: mtd0 (mtd0ro mtdblock0) - With partition and MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER=n mtd0 (mtd0ro mtdblock0) mtd_master0 - With partition and MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER=y mtd0 (mtd0ro mtdblock0) [this is the master] mtd1 (mtd1ro mtdblock1) I am suggesting: - Without partition: mtd0 (mtd0ro mtdblock0) mtd_master0 -> link to mtd0 - With partition and MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER=n mtd0 (mtd0ro mtdblock0) mtd_master0 - With partition and MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER=y mtd0 (mtd0ro mtdblock0) [this is the master] mtd1 (mtd1ro mtdblock1) mtd_master0 -> link to mtd0 What do you think? Or maybe even always mtd_master in the first place. Richard, your point of view on this? Thanks, Miquèl
