On 7/31/2025 10:46 AM, Suraj Kandpal wrote:
Add a function that helps identify if the rate provided needs to
be overridden. For this we need a function that compares the rate
provided and bitmask of rates provided in VBT.

--v2
-Rename functions [Jani]
-Return the mask instead of parsing it in function [Jani]
-Move the declaration in header [Jani]

Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kand...@intel.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h |  2 ++
  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
index 8337ebe0f2c8..7adb7c4b0432 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
@@ -2480,6 +2480,25 @@ static int parse_bdb_216_dp_max_link_rate(const int 
vbt_max_link_rate)
        }
  }
+static u32 edp_rate_override_mask(int rate)
+{
+       switch (rate) {
+       case 2000000: return BDB_263_VBT_EDP_LINK_RATE_20;
+       case 1350000: return BDB_263_VBT_EDP_LINK_RATE_13_5;
+       case 1000000: return BDB_263_VBT_EDP_LINK_RATE_10;
+       case 810000: return BDB_263_VBT_EDP_LINK_RATE_8_1;
+       case 675000: return BDB_263_VBT_EDP_LINK_RATE_6_75;
+       case 540000: return BDB_263_VBT_EDP_LINK_RATE_5_4;
+       case 432000: return BDB_263_VBT_EDP_LINK_RATE_4_32;
+       case 324000: return BDB_263_VBT_EDP_LINK_RATE_3_24;
+       case 270000: return BDB_263_VBT_EDP_LINK_RATE_2_7;
+       case 243000: return BDB_263_VBT_EDP_LINK_RATE_2_43;
+       case 216000: return BDB_263_VBT_EDP_LINK_RATE_2_16;
+       case 162000: return BDB_263_VBT_EDP_LINK_RATE_1_62;
+       default: return 0;
+       }
+}
+
  int intel_bios_dp_max_link_rate(const struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata)
  {
        if (!devdata || devdata->display->vbt.version < 216)
@@ -2499,6 +2518,16 @@ int intel_bios_dp_max_lane_count(const struct 
intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata)
        return devdata->child.dp_max_lane_count + 1;
  }
+bool
+intel_bios_encoder_supports_edp_rate(const struct intel_bios_encoder_data 
*devdata,
+                                    int rate)
+{
+       if (!devdata || devdata->display->vbt.version < 263)
+               return false;
+
+       return devdata->child.edp_data_rate_override & 
edp_rate_override_mask(rate);


The function name intel_bios_encoder_supports_edp_rate() suggests that it returns true if a given eDP rate is supported. However, the current implementation returns true when the corresponding bit is set in edp_data_rate_override,
which actually indicates that the rate is rejected.

To avoid confusion, either the function should be renamed to intel_bios_encoder_rejects_edp_rate() to reflect its actual behavior, or the logic should be inverted so that the function returns true
only when the rate is acceptable.

Regards,

Ankit

+}
+
  static void sanitize_device_type(struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata,
                                 enum port port)
  {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h
index 6cd7a011b8c4..a4abaa89a682 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h
@@ -251,6 +251,8 @@ bool intel_bios_encoder_supports_dvi(const struct 
intel_bios_encoder_data *devda
  bool intel_bios_encoder_supports_hdmi(const struct intel_bios_encoder_data 
*devdata);
  bool intel_bios_encoder_supports_dp(const struct intel_bios_encoder_data 
*devdata);
  bool intel_bios_encoder_supports_edp(const struct intel_bios_encoder_data 
*devdata);
+bool intel_bios_encoder_supports_edp_rate(const struct intel_bios_encoder_data 
*devdata,
+                                         int rate);
  bool intel_bios_encoder_supports_typec_usb(const struct 
intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata);
  bool intel_bios_encoder_supports_tbt(const struct intel_bios_encoder_data 
*devdata);
  bool intel_bios_encoder_supports_dsi(const struct intel_bios_encoder_data 
*devdata);

Reply via email to