On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 10:58 AM Zihuan Zhang <zhangzih...@kylinos.cn> wrote:
>
> Replace the manual cpufreq_cpu_put() with __free(put_cpufreq_policy)
> annotation for policy references. This reduces the risk of reference
> counting mistakes and aligns the code with the latest kernel style.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzih...@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c | 18 ++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c 
> b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
> index 1219adb11ab9..3c8b57df9619 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
> @@ -62,19 +62,14 @@ static int phys_package_first_cpu(int cpu)
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> -static int cpu_has_cpufreq(unsigned int cpu)
> +static bool cpu_has_cpufreq(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
> -       struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> +       struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = 
> cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
>
>         if (!acpi_processor_cpufreq_init)
>                 return 0;
>
> -       policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> -       if (policy) {
> -               cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> -               return 1;
> -       }
> -       return 0;
> +       return !!policy;
>  }
>
>  static int cpufreq_get_max_state(unsigned int cpu)
> @@ -95,7 +90,6 @@ static int cpufreq_get_cur_state(unsigned int cpu)
>
>  static int cpufreq_set_cur_state(unsigned int cpu, int state)
>  {
> -       struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
>         struct acpi_processor *pr;
>         unsigned long max_freq;
>         int i, ret;
> @@ -111,6 +105,9 @@ static int cpufreq_set_cur_state(unsigned int cpu, int 
> state)
>          * frequency.
>          */
>         for_each_online_cpu(i) {

I would still prefer the code below to be moved to a separate function
that would be called in each step of the for_each_online_cpu() loop.

> +               struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) =
> +                       cpufreq_cpu_get(i);
> +
>                 if (topology_physical_package_id(i) !=
>                     topology_physical_package_id(cpu))
>                         continue;
> @@ -120,15 +117,12 @@ static int cpufreq_set_cur_state(unsigned int cpu, int 
> state)
>                 if (unlikely(!freq_qos_request_active(&pr->thermal_req)))
>                         continue;
>
> -               policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(i);
>                 if (!policy)
>                         return -EINVAL;
>
>                 max_freq = (policy->cpuinfo.max_freq *
>                             (100 - reduction_step(i) * 
> cpufreq_thermal_reduction_pctg)) / 100;
>
> -               cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> -
>                 ret = freq_qos_update_request(&pr->thermal_req, max_freq);
>                 if (ret < 0) {
>                         pr_warn("Failed to update thermal freq constraint: 
> CPU%d (%d)\n",
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>

Reply via email to