We do not need a case switch to check cap_type_id in intel_vgpu_ioctl
for various reasons (it's impossible to hit the default case in the
current code, there's only one valid case to check, the error handling
code overlaps in both cases, etc.).  Simplify the case switch into a
single if statement.  This has the additional effect of simplifying the
error handling code.

Note that it is still currently impossible for
'if (cap_type_id == VFIO_REGION_INFO_CAP_SPARSE_MMAP)'
to fail, but we should still guard against the possibility of this
changing in the future.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cav...@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.sh...@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 13 ++++---------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
index 69830a5c49d3..70af86d46fe8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
@@ -1279,20 +1279,15 @@ static long intel_vgpu_ioctl(struct vfio_device 
*vfio_dev, unsigned int cmd,
                }
 
                if ((info.flags & VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_CAPS) && sparse) {
-                       switch (cap_type_id) {
-                       case VFIO_REGION_INFO_CAP_SPARSE_MMAP:
+                       ret = -EINVAL;
+                       if (cap_type_id == VFIO_REGION_INFO_CAP_SPARSE_MMAP)
                                ret = vfio_info_add_capability(&caps,
                                        &sparse->header,
                                        struct_size(sparse, areas,
                                                    sparse->nr_areas));
-                               if (ret) {
-                                       kfree(sparse);
-                                       return ret;
-                               }
-                               break;
-                       default:
+                       if (ret) {
                                kfree(sparse);
-                               return -EINVAL;
+                               return ret;
                        }
                }
 
-- 
2.43.0

Reply via email to