On Sun, Sep 21, 2025 at 10:05:34AM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Until LNL, intel_dsb_wait_vblanks() waits for the undelayed vblank start.
> However, from PTL onwards, it waits for the start of the safe window,
> defined by the number of lines programmed in TRANS_SET_CONTEXT_LATENCY.
> This change was introduced to move the SCL window out of the vblank region,
> supporting modes with higher refresh rates and smaller vblanks.
>
> As a result, on PTL+ platforms, the DSB wait for vblank completes exactly
> SCL lines earlier than the undelayed vblank start. Since we use
> intel_dsb_wait_vblanks() to time the send push operation, this causes
> issues when SCL lines are non-zero.
>
> Instead of relying on the helper, instruct the DSB to wait from
> (undelayed vblank start - SCL) to (delayed vblank start - SCL) before
> sending the push. This approach works for both pre-PTL and PTL+ platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nauti...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index bfeec3706f35..8d78037d5a2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -7265,7 +7265,7 @@ static void intel_atomic_dsb_finish(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state,
> new_crtc_state->dsb_color);
>
> if (new_crtc_state->use_dsb &&
> !intel_color_uses_chained_dsb(new_crtc_state)) {
> - intel_dsb_wait_vblanks(new_crtc_state->dsb_commit, 1);
> + intel_dsb_wait_for_scl_start(state, new_crtc_state->dsb_commit);
>
> intel_vrr_send_push(new_crtc_state->dsb_commit, new_crtc_state);
> intel_dsb_wait_for_scl_lines(state, new_crtc_state->dsb_commit);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> index 400dcc87a992..e94a05cc8c82 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> @@ -826,6 +826,22 @@ void intel_dsb_wait_for_scl_lines(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state,
> intel_dsb_wait_usec(dsb, usecs);
> }
>
> +void intel_dsb_wait_for_scl_start(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + struct intel_dsb *dsb)
> +{
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc = dsb->crtc;
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
> + intel_pre_commit_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> + int undelayed_vblank_start = crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vdisplay;
> + int delayed_vblank_start =
> crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_start;
> + int start, end;
> +
> + start = undelayed_vblank_start - crtc_state->set_context_latency;
> + end = delayed_vblank_start - crtc_state->set_context_latency;
For these we perhaps want something like:
intel_vrr_safe_window_start()
{
if (ptl+)
return crtc_vdisplay - set_context_latency;
else
return crtc_vdisplay;
}
intel_vrr_vmin_safe_window_end()
{
intel_vrr_vmin_vblank_start() - set_context_latency;
}
> +
> + intel_dsb_wait_scanline_out(state, dsb, start, end);
And I suspect we want to do this just before the usec wait in
intel_dsb_wait_vblank_delay() (for the VRR case only). No need
to bother higher level code with this, I think.
> +}
> +
> /**
> * intel_dsb_commit() - Trigger workload execution of DSB.
> * @dsb: DSB context
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
> index 1cb5ba1a0534..5985d0024dae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
> @@ -73,5 +73,7 @@ void intel_dsb_wait(struct intel_dsb *dsb);
>
> void intel_dsb_irq_handler(struct intel_display *display,
> enum pipe pipe, enum intel_dsb_id dsb_id);
> +void intel_dsb_wait_for_scl_start(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + struct intel_dsb *dsb);
>
> #endif
> --
> 2.45.2
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
