On Mon, 10 Nov 2025, Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 09:31:39PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> Shorten the intel_display_irq_regs_* function names to the underlying >> function names with a _wl suffix for clarity. >> >> - intel_display_irq_regs_init() -> irq_init_wl() >> - intel_display_irq_regs_reset() -> irq_reset_wl() >> - intel_display_irq_regs_assert_irr_is_zero() -> assert_iir_is_zero_wl() >> >> This emphasizes the difference is the wakelock. Platforms without the >> DMC wakelock mechanism can use the non-wl versions. > > These things should just get nuked. You already switched to > intel_de_{read,write}() in the previous patch, and those already > handle the wakelock stuff for you.
Oh where's my brown paper bag when I need it. -- Jani Nikula, Intel
