On 09-01-2026 16:53, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 1/9/26 12:08, Murthy, Arun R wrote:
From: Michel Dänzer <[email protected]>
On 1/8/26 10:43, Arun R Murthy wrote:
Along with async flip if there is a request to disable a sync plane by
providing a NULL fb allow them.
That could result in async changes to other planes taking effect in an earlier
refresh cycle than the sync plane being disabled, couldn't it? In which case the
commit arguably wouldn't actually be "atomic".

This is the request from the community to allow disabling of a sync plane in an 
async flip atomic ioctl.
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/13834
Can't see any such request there. I suspect there might be a misunderstanding.

Here cursor is a sync flip.
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/13834#note_2855843

Thanks and Regards,
Arun R Murthy
--------------------

Reply via email to