This is PURELY a CI run. I want to see what happens if I change
the igt_atomic selftests to use a sleeping context instead. I do
believe that there should be no functional change, and it's not
necessary to convert the uncore lock to a raw spinlock.

I hope I'm right!

Maarten Lankhorst (20):
  drm/vblank_work: Add methods to schedule vblank_work in 2 stages
  drm/vblank: Add a 2-stage version of drm_crtc_arm_vblank_event
  drm/intel/display: Make intel_crtc_arm_vblank_event static
  drm/intel/display: Convert vblank event handling to 2-stage arming
  drm/i915/display: Move vblank put until after critical section
  drm/i915/display: Remove locking from intel_vblank_evade critical
    section
  drm/i915/display: Handle vlv dsi workaround in scanline_in_safe_range
    too
  drm/i915/display: Make get_vblank_counter use intel_de_read_fw()
  drm/i915/display: Do not take uncore lock in i915_get_vblank_counter
  drm/i915/display: Make icl_dsi_frame_update use _fw too
  drm/i915/display: Use intel_de_read/write_fw in colorops
  drm/i915/display: Use intel_de_write_fw in intel_pipe_fastset
  drm/i915/display: Make set_pipeconf use the fw variants
  drm/i915/display: Fix intel_lpe_audio_irq_handler for PREEMPT-RT
  drm/i915/gt: Fix selftests on PREEMPT_RT
  drm/i915/gt: Set stop_timeout() correctly on PREEMPT-RT
  drm/i915/display: Remove uncore lock from vlv_atomic_update_fifo
  drm/i915: Use sleeping selftests for igt_atomic on PREEMPT_RT
  PREEMPT_RT injection
  FOR-CI: bump MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES

Mike Galbraith (1):
  drm/i915: Use preempt_disable/enable_rt() where recommended

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (4):
  drm/i915/gt: Use spin_lock_irq() instead of local_irq_disable() +
    spin_lock()
  drm/i915: Drop the irqs_disabled() check
  drm/i915/guc: Consider also RCU depth in busy loop.
  Revert "drm/i915: Depend on !PREEMPT_RT."

 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c                  |  61 +++++++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank_work.c             | 106 ++++++++++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig                  |   1 -
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig.debug            |  15 ---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_wm.c        |   4 -
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c        |   4 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c    |   6 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c     |  86 ++++++-------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.h     |   1 -
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c   |   8 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h       |   8 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c  |  46 +++----
 .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lpe_audio.c    |   2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c   | 115 ++++++++++--------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.h   |   1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c      |  18 +--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c     |   2 +-
 .../drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c  |  17 +--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_pm.c  |   8 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h        |   2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c           |   2 -
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h           |  26 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_atomic.c   |   7 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig.debug              |   5 +
 .../drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_uncore.h |   7 ++
 include/drm/drm_vblank.h                      |  14 ++-
 include/drm/drm_vblank_work.h                 |  12 ++
 kernel/Kconfig.preempt                        |   4 +-
 lib/Kconfig.debug                             |   4 +-
 29 files changed, 383 insertions(+), 209 deletions(-)

-- 
2.51.0

Reply via email to