On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 01:53:58PM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 04:04:32PM +0100, Marco Crivellari wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 11:00 AM Marco Crivellari > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Marco Crivellari (3): > > > drm/i915: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq > > > drm/i915: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq in the > > > documentation > > > drm/i915: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users > > > > Gentle ping. > > I checked patchwork and seems still in the "New" state. > > Please ignore patchwork status. > > Both patches queued towards the next merge window targeting 7.1 > > fa171b805f25 ("drm/xe: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq") > 0bc2c2e1a388 ("drm/xe: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users")
doh! please ignore me. The similar subject titles confused me. I just pushed this i915 series to drm-intel-next. Now, also queued for 7.1 along with the xe above. c15d0056fb74 drm/i915: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users 4fb289d352e3 drm/i915: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq in the documentation 36ed3648a2f3 drm/i915: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq > > Thanks, > Rodrigo. > > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > > > Marco Crivellari > > > > L3 Support Engineer
