On 2026-03-10 19:14:18 [+0100], Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Hey, Hi, > > Otherwise things are looking good! Have you uncovered anything else?
I would swap the ordering 23 <-> 26 in | ├─>[PATCH v7 23/26] Revert "drm/i915: Depend on !PREEMPT_RT." | ├─>[PATCH v7 26/26] drm/i915/gt: Add a spinlock to prevent starvation of irq_work. but other than that it all looks good. I tested it by using it on my two boxes with i915 compatible hw and didn't notice anything. I've been using -next + this series. > Kind regards, > ~Maarten Lankhorst Sebastian
