Jani Nikula <[email protected]> writes:

> On Mon, 11 May 2026, Matt Roper <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 01:30:59PM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
>>> Just like it is done for the platform-specific bandwidth parameters, use
>>> a separate function named get_display_bw_params() to return the display
>>> IP-specific parameters.  This simplifies intel_bw_init_hw() by having
>>> just one call for each of the *_get_bw_info() functions.
>>> 
>>> v2:
>>>   - Prefer to call get_display_bw_params() only once in
>>>     intel_bw_init_hw() instead of having multiple calls in each of the
>>>     affected *_get_bw_info() functions. (Jani)
>>> 
>>> Cc: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 36 
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c 
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
>>> index c01356d38e64..acd1b6901b46 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
>>> @@ -493,6 +493,26 @@ static const struct intel_display_bw_params 
>>> xelpdp_bw_params = {
>>>     .displayrtids = 256,
>>>  };
>>>  
>>> +static const struct intel_display_bw_params *get_display_bw_params(struct 
>>> intel_display *display)
>>> +{
>>> +   if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 14) {
>>> +           return &xelpdp_bw_params;
>>> +   } else if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 12) {
>>> +           /*
>>> +            * RKL's SoC was based on ICL and the display, even though being
>>> +            * gen12, had changes to the memory interface to match gen11's,
>>> +            * consequently inheriting gen11's display-specific bandwidth
>>> +            * parameters.
>>> +            */
>>> +           if (display->platform.rocketlake)
>>> +                   return &gen11_bw_params;
>>> +           else
>>> +                   return &gen12_bw_params;
>>> +   } else {
>>> +           return &gen11_bw_params;
>>
>> It doesn't really matter, but this is technically going to assign gen11
>> parameters for all the pre-gen11 platforms that call through here on
>> i915.  If we never use the values it probably doesn't hurt anything, but
>> it might be best to make this a condition on gen11 rather than an 'else'
>> just to avoid any confusion.
>>
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>> +   }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  static int icl_get_bw_info(struct intel_display *display,
>>>                        const struct dram_info *dram_info,
>>>                        const struct intel_soc_bw_params *soc_bw_params,
>>> @@ -843,6 +863,7 @@ void intel_bw_init_hw(struct intel_display *display)
>>>  {
>>>     const struct dram_info *dram_info = intel_dram_info(display);
>>>     const struct intel_soc_bw_params *soc_bw_params = 
>>> get_soc_bw_params(display);
>>> +   const struct intel_display_bw_params *display_bw_params = 
>>> get_display_bw_params(display);
>
> Feels like it gets increasingly weird to call all these functions
> unconditionally when we bail out for !display right below.

Yeah.  Let's fix that. I'll have a separate patch for moving
intel_dram_info() down and then fix the two patches that add the other
calls.

--
Gustavo Sousa

>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>>>  
>>>     if (!HAS_DISPLAY(display))
>>>             return;
>>> @@ -858,23 +879,12 @@ void intel_bw_init_hw(struct intel_display *display)
>>>  
>>>     if (DISPLAY_VERx100(display) >= 1401 && display->platform.dgfx) {
>>>             xe2_hpd_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, soc_bw_params);
>>> -   } else if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 14) {
>>> -           tgl_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, soc_bw_params, 
>>> &xelpdp_bw_params);
>>>     } else if (display->platform.dg2) {
>>>             dg2_get_bw_info(display);
>>>     } else if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 12) {
>>> -           /*
>>> -            * RKL's SoC was based on ICL and the display, even though being
>>> -            * gen12, had changes to the memory interface to match gen11's,
>>> -            * consequently inheriting gen11's display-specific bandwidth
>>> -            * parameters.
>>> -            */
>>> -           if (display->platform.rocketlake)
>>> -                   tgl_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, soc_bw_params, 
>>> &gen11_bw_params);
>>> -           else
>>> -                   tgl_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, soc_bw_params, 
>>> &gen12_bw_params);
>>> +           tgl_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, soc_bw_params, 
>>> display_bw_params);
>>>     } else if (DISPLAY_VER(display) == 11) {
>>> -           icl_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, soc_bw_params, 
>>> &gen11_bw_params);
>>> +           icl_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, soc_bw_params, 
>>> display_bw_params);
>>>     }
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> 2.53.0
>>> 
>
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel

Reply via email to