On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 05:19:19PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2026, Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 10:58:35AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> xe_display_flush_cleanup_work() is a bit of an oddball function in xe
> >> display code. There shouldn't be anything this specific or xe
> >> specific. While I'm not sure what the correct refactor for the function
> >> should be, move it to shared display code for starters, next to the
> >> eerily similar but slightly different intel_has_pending_fb_unpin() that
> >> is only called from i915 core.
> >> 
> >> The main goal here is to unblock some refactors on
> >> for_each_intel_crtc().
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 21 +++++++++++++++
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h |  1 +
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c      | 27 +++-----------------
> >>  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c 
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >> index d5cf1476c7b9..50feca52b962 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >> @@ -737,6 +737,27 @@ bool intel_has_pending_fb_unpin(struct intel_display 
> >> *display)
> >>    return false;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> +void intel_display_flush_cleanup_work(struct intel_display *display)
> >> +{
> >> +  struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> >> +
> >> +  for_each_intel_crtc(display->drm, crtc) {
> >> +          struct drm_crtc_commit *commit;
> >> +
> >> +          spin_lock(&crtc->base.commit_lock);
> >> +          commit = list_first_entry_or_null(&crtc->base.commit_list,
> >> +                                            struct drm_crtc_commit, 
> >> commit_entry);
> >> +          if (commit)
> >> +                  drm_crtc_commit_get(commit);
> >> +          spin_unlock(&crtc->base.commit_lock);
> >> +
> >> +          if (commit) {
> >> +                  wait_for_completion(&commit->cleanup_done);
> >> +                  drm_crtc_commit_put(commit);
> >> +          }
> >> +  }
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  /*
> >>   * Finds the encoder associated with the given CRTC. This can only be
> >>   * used when we know that the CRTC isn't feeding multiple encoders!
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h 
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> >> index a43ada0c0502..65f8c81a7bae 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> >> @@ -402,6 +402,7 @@ void intel_disable_transcoder(const struct 
> >> intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state);
> >>  void i830_enable_pipe(struct intel_display *display, enum pipe pipe);
> >>  void i830_disable_pipe(struct intel_display *display, enum pipe pipe);
> >>  bool intel_has_pending_fb_unpin(struct intel_display *display);
> >> +void intel_display_flush_cleanup_work(struct intel_display *display);
> >>  void intel_encoder_destroy(struct drm_encoder *encoder);
> >>  struct drm_display_mode *
> >>  intel_encoder_current_mode(struct intel_encoder *encoder);
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c 
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> >> index aa73023b7398..ef27fdfdbab2 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> >> @@ -258,27 +258,6 @@ static bool suspend_to_idle(void)
> >>    return false;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> -static void xe_display_flush_cleanup_work(struct xe_device *xe)
> >> -{
> >> -  struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> >> -
> >> -  for_each_intel_crtc(&xe->drm, crtc) {
> >> -          struct drm_crtc_commit *commit;
> >> -
> >> -          spin_lock(&crtc->base.commit_lock);
> >> -          commit = list_first_entry_or_null(&crtc->base.commit_list,
> >> -                                            struct drm_crtc_commit, 
> >> commit_entry);
> >> -          if (commit)
> >> -                  drm_crtc_commit_get(commit);
> >> -          spin_unlock(&crtc->base.commit_lock);
> >> -
> >> -          if (commit) {
> >> -                  wait_for_completion(&commit->cleanup_done);
> >> -                  drm_crtc_commit_put(commit);
> >> -          }
> >> -  }
> >> -}
> >> -
> >>  static void xe_display_enable_d3cold(struct xe_device *xe)
> >>  {
> >>    struct intel_display *display = xe->display;
> >> @@ -292,7 +271,7 @@ static void xe_display_enable_d3cold(struct xe_device 
> >> *xe)
> >>     */
> >>    intel_power_domains_disable(display);
> >>  
> >> -  xe_display_flush_cleanup_work(xe);
> >> +  intel_display_flush_cleanup_work(display);
> >>  
> >>    intel_opregion_suspend(display, PCI_D3cold);
> >>  
> >> @@ -347,7 +326,7 @@ void xe_display_pm_suspend(struct xe_device *xe)
> >>            intel_display_driver_suspend(display);
> >>    }
> >>  
> >> -  xe_display_flush_cleanup_work(xe);
> >> +  intel_display_flush_cleanup_work(display);
> >
> > intel_display_driver_suspend() already flushes the cleanup wq. So I
> > think this is doing nothing. The correct answer seems to be to nuke
> > the whole thing. We are missing the wq flush from the shutdown() path
> > in i915 however, so I suppose we should add it there.
> >
> >>  
> >>    intel_encoder_block_all_hpds(display);
> >>  
> >> @@ -379,7 +358,7 @@ void xe_display_pm_shutdown(struct xe_device *xe)
> >>            intel_display_driver_suspend(display);
> >
> > This should rather be the same atomic helper shutdown that i915 uses.
> > I guess what we want is a intel_display_driver_shutdown() to pair
> > up with intel_display_driver_suspend().
> 
> Yeah, well, another "Hal fixes a light bulb" moment. I just wanted to
> clean up the iterators, but I can't do that with xe having crtc
> iteration, which it never should have had in the first place.
> 
> I think all of the i915/xe/display probe/cleanup/suspend/resume paths
> are a gigantic mess. It was a mess with just i915, and xe added another,
> *different* mess. They both do things differently, but *neither* should
> be calling low-level display stuff directly.
> 
> I'll try to cook something up for this.

Fwiw, this came up already earlier [1] and then I came up with
https://github.com/ideak/linux/commits/suspend-shutdown-refactor

but haven't followed up with it. For reference I rebased it now on
drm-tip.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/aIjizdet9ZUXB-yx@ideak-desk

> 
> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
> >
> >>    }
> >>  
> >> -  xe_display_flush_cleanup_work(xe);
> >> +  intel_display_flush_cleanup_work(display);
> >>    intel_dp_mst_suspend(display);
> >>    intel_encoder_block_all_hpds(display);
> >>    intel_hpd_cancel_work(display);
> >> -- 
> >> 2.47.3
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel

Reply via email to