On Thu, 08 May 2014, Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 05:32:21PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Wed, 09 Apr 2014, [email protected] wrote: >> > From: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> >> > >> > Same as on other gen8 devices. >> > >> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> >> > Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> >> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> >> > --- >> > arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c | 3 ++- >> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c >> > b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c >> > index bc4a088..5758f5b 100644 >> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c >> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c >> > @@ -347,7 +347,8 @@ static struct pci_device_id intel_stolen_ids[] >> > __initdata = { >> > INTEL_HSW_D_IDS(gen6_stolen_size), >> > INTEL_HSW_M_IDS(gen6_stolen_size), >> > INTEL_BDW_M_IDS(gen8_stolen_size), >> > - INTEL_BDW_D_IDS(gen8_stolen_size) >> > + INTEL_BDW_D_IDS(gen8_stolen_size), >> > + INTEL_CHV_PCI_IDS(gen8_stolen_size) >> >> Needs refresh after the update to the #define. > > This patch is actually wrong. We need CHV specific stolen size detection > here. And in fact we get it as part of patch 34/71. I'll go and split > that up into i915 and x86 specific parts and pretend that this patch > never existed.
Right, I'm actually looking at 34 now. > >> >> Otherwise, >> >> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> >> >> >> > }; >> > >> > static void __init intel_graphics_stolen(int num, int slot, int func) >> > -- >> > 1.8.3.2 >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Intel-gfx mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx >> >> -- >> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center > > -- > Ville Syrjälä > Intel OTC -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
