On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 02:04:04PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Try to unify the suspend paths and behaviour by moving the
> intel_opregion_suspend() calls to
> intel_display_driver_pm_suspend_late().
> 
> This is a change in the suspend sequences. The idea behind adding this
> to intel_display_driver_pm_suspend_late() is primarily based on not
> having to pass the s2idle parameter to more functions than that.
> 
> This also changes behaviour for i915 hibernation, going for PCI_D3cold
> instead of PCI_D1 on hibernate. It's probably the correct thing to do
> anyway, I don't think it should matter all that much, but fingers
> crossed.

acpi_target_system_state() should always return S4 for
hibernation. I'm not sure why we even check !hibernation
here... Looks like it's just a pointless thing left over
by commit c7b5abd3e030 ("drm/i915: Remove i915_drm_suspend_mode")

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c | 2 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c                  | 4 ----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c             | 3 ---
>  3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
> index 6cac36157bea..1525ff7a1dc2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
> @@ -770,6 +770,8 @@ void intel_display_driver_pm_suspend_late(struct 
> intel_display *display, bool s2
>       if (!HAS_DISPLAY(display))
>               return;
>  
> +     intel_opregion_suspend(display, s2idle ? PCI_D1 : PCI_D3cold);
> +
>       intel_display_power_suspend_late(display, s2idle);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> index 40fc15017486..7d0f98cbf5d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> @@ -1096,7 +1096,6 @@ static int i915_drm_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
>  {
>       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
>       struct intel_display *display = dev_priv->display;
> -     pci_power_t opregion_target_state;
>  
>       disable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
>  
> @@ -1110,9 +1109,6 @@ static int i915_drm_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
>  
>       i9xx_display_sr_save(display);
>  
> -     opregion_target_state = suspend_to_idle(dev_priv) ? PCI_D1 : PCI_D3cold;
> -     intel_opregion_suspend(display, opregion_target_state);
> -
>       dev_priv->suspend_count++;
>  
>       enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> index 9416405667d8..73891b36341b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> @@ -266,14 +266,11 @@ static bool suspend_to_idle(void)
>  void xe_display_pm_suspend(struct xe_device *xe)
>  {
>       struct intel_display *display = xe->display;
> -     bool s2idle = suspend_to_idle();
>  
>       if (!xe->info.probe_display)
>               return;
>  
>       intel_display_driver_pm_suspend(display);
> -
> -     intel_opregion_suspend(display, s2idle ? PCI_D1 : PCI_D3cold);
>  }
>  
>  void xe_display_pm_suspend_late(struct xe_device *xe)
> -- 
> 2.47.3

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

Reply via email to