On Fri, 12 Jun 2026, Ville Syrjala wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>Currently bxt_sanitize_cdclk() assumes that bxt_cdclk_cd2x_pipe(INVALID_PIPE) gives us the full mask for for the relevant bitfield. While that is true, it does make the code a bit confusing to read. Introduce bxt_cdclk_cd2x_pipe_mask() to make the situation a bit less confusing. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Michał Grzelak <[email protected]> BR, Michał
