On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 09:58:03AM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
> 
> On 6/23/2026 3:06 AM, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> >
> > Adjust the panel fixed mode selection algorithm to only consider
> > fixed modes that are "VRR compatible" with the old fixed mode
> > when userspace doesn't want to allow full modesets. This will
> > allow a VRR based refresh rate changes (ie. just a change in
> > the vblank length) via the fastset path.
> >
> > When full modesets are allowed, we still use the original algorithm
> > as that may pick a fixed mode with a more optimal dotclock, potentially
> > leading to reduced power consumption.
> >
> > This approach works as long as userspace does the initial
> > allow_modeset=true commit using the highest refresh rate it will
> > want to use. Subsequent commits with allow_modeset=false can then
> > switch between lower refresh rates without blinks.
> >
> > One remaining hurdle we may need to solve is the guardband length.
> > Assuming the highest refresh rate vblank is too short for
> > intel_vrr_compute_optimized_guardband() the intitial guardband will
> > match the highest refresh rate vblank. A subsequent switch to a lower
> > refresh rate will then recompute the guardband and select a value
> > that is higher (since the vblank will be longer). The mismatch in
> > guardband lengths will prevent the fastset. We may either have to
> > preserve the original (sub-optimal) guardband, or we'll have to
> > revisit the idea of changing the guardband without a full modeset.
> >
> > Note that I'm not 100% happy with this solution because
> > intel_panel_fixed_mode() is no longer fully idempotent, but I wasn't
> > able to come up with anything truly better either :/ The simple
> > solution would be just to always pick the fixed mode with the highest
> > dotclock, but that could lead to increased power consumption even
> > when high refresh rates are never used.
> >
> > Perhaps the proper solution would be to just deprecate this
> > idea of taking in random modes for internal panels and then
> > cooking up a compatible fixed modes. Life would be easier if
> > userspace was required to provide the desired fixed mode directly.
> > But in order to do that we'd need to introduce new uapi properties
> > to control the pfit aspect of this, and we'd probably need a new
> > client cap to select between the old and new userspace behaviour.
> > Something to consider in the future...
> >
> > v2: Rebase due to earlier changes to VRR fixed mode selection
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <[email protected]> #v1
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> >   1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
> > index faa24537ef63..81e638d0c7b3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
> > @@ -72,9 +72,20 @@ static bool is_best_fixed_mode(struct intel_connector 
> > *connector,
> >             abs(drm_mode_vrefresh(best_mode) - vrefresh);
> >   }
> >   
> > +static bool is_vrr_compatible(const struct drm_display_mode *mode1,
> > +                         const struct drm_display_mode *mode2)
> > +{
> > +   return drm_mode_match(mode1, mode2,
> > +                         DRM_MODE_MATCH_CLOCK |
> > +                         DRM_MODE_MATCH_TIMINGS_VRR |
> > +                         DRM_MODE_MATCH_FLAGS |
> > +                         DRM_MODE_MATCH_3D_FLAGS);
> > +}
> > +
> >   static const struct drm_display_mode *
> >   intel_panel_fixed_mode_vrr(struct intel_connector *connector,
> > -                      const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> > +                      const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> > +                      const struct drm_display_mode *vrr_ref_mode)
> >   {
> >     const struct drm_display_mode *fixed_mode, *best_mode = NULL;
> >     int vrefresh = drm_mode_vrefresh(mode);
> > @@ -82,6 +93,10 @@ intel_panel_fixed_mode_vrr(struct intel_connector 
> > *connector,
> >     if (!intel_vrr_is_in_range(connector, vrefresh))
> >             return NULL;
> >   
> > +   if (vrr_ref_mode &&
> > +       !intel_vrr_is_in_range(connector, drm_mode_vrefresh(vrr_ref_mode)))
> > +           return NULL;
> > +
> >     list_for_each_entry(fixed_mode, &connector->panel.fixed_modes, head) {
> >             int fixed_mode_vrefresh = drm_mode_vrefresh(fixed_mode);
> >   
> > @@ -96,6 +111,10 @@ intel_panel_fixed_mode_vrr(struct intel_connector 
> > *connector,
> >             if (fixed_mode_vrefresh < vrefresh)
> >                     continue;
> >   
> > +           if (vrr_ref_mode &&
> > +               !is_vrr_compatible(fixed_mode, vrr_ref_mode))
> > +                   continue;
> > +
> >             if (is_best_fixed_mode(connector, vrefresh,
> >                                    fixed_mode_vrefresh, best_mode))
> >                     best_mode = fixed_mode;
> > @@ -224,10 +243,27 @@ static int intel_panel_compute_config_vrr(struct 
> > intel_atomic_state *state,
> >                                       struct intel_connector *connector)
> >   {
> >     struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
> > -   const struct drm_display_mode *fixed_mode;
> > +   const struct drm_display_mode *fixed_mode = NULL;
> >     int vrefresh, fixed_mode_vrefresh;
> >   
> 
> Perhaps an early return for if (!vrr_is_capable()) here will avoid two 
> calls for intel_panel_fixed_mode_vrr().

That's essentially the first thing intel_panel_fixed_mode_vrr() will
end up doing. Granted, we do go through a few extra functions calls
to get there, but I expect that to be negligible given we're about
to run through the whole state compute machinery anyway.

There are probably much more fruitful places to optimize if we were
to actually measure the whole thing.

> 
> I leave it to you.
> 
> In any case the patch LGTM.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <[email protected]>

Thanks.

> 
> > -   fixed_mode = intel_panel_fixed_mode_vrr(connector, adjusted_mode);
> > +   /*
> > +    * Attempt a VRR based refresh rate change if possible
> > +    * when userspace has forbidden a full modeset.
> > +    */
> > +   if (!state->base.allow_modeset) {
> > +           struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> > +           const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state =
> > +                   intel_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> > +
> > +           if (old_crtc_state->hw.enable &&
> > +               old_crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask == 
> > crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask)
> > +                   fixed_mode = intel_panel_fixed_mode_vrr(connector, 
> > adjusted_mode,
> > +                                                           
> > &old_crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode);
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   if (!fixed_mode)
> > +           fixed_mode = intel_panel_fixed_mode_vrr(connector, 
> > adjusted_mode, NULL);
> > +
> >     if (!fixed_mode)
> >             return -EINVAL;
> >   

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

Reply via email to